if legion would consider, even for a second, the possibility of letting chris come back, then they'd just lose all respect they've ever had.
also i ****ing hate people who keep talking about like buttons, i know youre all facebook scum, but still, are you too lazy to fricking type that you actually like something? crap.
excuse my bad manners, dear sir, i was blinded by a tremendous case of facebook related animosityif legion would consider, even for a second, the possibility of letting chris come back, then they'd just lose all respect they've ever had.
also i ****ing hate people who keep talking about like buttons, i know youre all facebook scum, but still, are you too lazy to fricking type that you actually like something? crap.
thats not a good way to talk to people! :ugeek:
This will ruin the "clan" concept even more.
Recruiting players that have not played WCL is ok, is a good idea. but players that have been already knocked out, is a joke.
this game is 10yrs old.. whatever makes the tourny interesting should be allowed.. rules can be ammended..
lol this thread makes me feel ashamed for playing in such dumb community
This will ruin the "clan" concept even more.
Recruiting players that have not played WCL is ok, is a good idea. but players that have been already knocked out, is a joke.
WTF?! How is it possible that I am only one who is called "silly fanboy"??!Well Chris been in the legion for many years. Also he was one of the players that won last wcl with only one loss. He must defend the title!
1: players should never be allowed to join a new team after their first team is nocked out. if u could do this it would make the finals always the same 6 experts no matter who they started the turny with, this is a competition of many different TEAMS not of a few experts that can change sides to climb up the ladder.
2: the only way i could see this being exceptable is if the players were picked on the basis of the team being nocked out because another player consistantly didnt show to matches. you can use my team, _CsK_ for example, I was at every single game and yet we never had a full team, either chris didnt show or we had to have our 4th be a 1400. so threw circumstances not under my control we were nockd out and my tournoment fun was over. but i dont believe there is really any other reason a person should be allowed to be added to another team, i dunno somone can correct me if im being totally biased here.
1: players should never be allowed to join a new team after their first team is nocked out. if u could do this it would make the finals always the same 6 experts no matter who they started the turny with, this is a competition of many different TEAMS not of a few experts that can change sides to climb up the ladder.
2: the only way i could see this being exceptable is if the players were picked on the basis of the team being nocked out because another player consistantly didnt show to matches. you can use my team, _CsK_ for example, I was at every single game and yet we never had a full team, either chris didnt show or we had to have our 4th be a 1400. so threw circumstances not under my control we were nockd out and my tournoment fun was over. but i dont believe there is really any other reason a person should be allowed to be added to another team, i dunno somone can correct me if im being totally biased here.
the 2nd part of your post is what i agree with. it was very frusterating to be knocked out in the qualification stage because people didnt show up and had to give an admin win. but with the way this was ruled, because we did play one match i was ineligible. but at this point of the tourney there is no team i would have played for anyway so i dont mind, but it would have been fun in the group stage when this issue surfaced several weeks ago