Drush actually is a bad strategy unless you have really good map because a fail drush can put you a lot behind and if you decides to go feuda after drush rather than fc, then your castle age timing would be worse off than others.
Drush actually is a bad strategy unless you have really good map because a fail drush can put you a lot behind and if you decides to go feuda after drush rather than fc, then your castle age timing would be worse off than others.
o well thats a lie drush gives you an advantage in eco so you will get better castle age times, and about army it is better i don't understand why u say drush is a bad strat it might be bad in the wrong hands but average is much better than going scouts xd
Drush actually is a bad strategy unless you have really good map because a fail drush can put you a lot behind and if you decides to go feuda after drush rather than fc, then your castle age timing would be worse off than others.
o well thats a lie drush gives you an advantage in eco so you will get better castle age times, and about army it is better i don't understand why u say drush is a bad strat it might be bad in the wrong hands but average is much better than going scouts xd
A guy who goes 22 pop feudal war can reach castle FASTER than the guy who first do drush and THEN start feudal war with scouts, skrims/archers etc.
yes it is. check any record. and unlike you I won't just post a useless Refuting comment I attach a proof too.
http://www.aoczone.net/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=89358
Check up times ( feudal and castle ) of game 1, 5, 7 and 8.
Drush actually is a bad strategy unless you have really good map because a fail drush can put you a lot behind and if you decides to go feuda after drush rather than fc, then your castle age timing would be worse off than others.
A guy who goes 22 pop feudal war can reach castle FASTER than the guy who first do drush and THEN start feudal war with scouts, skrims/archers etc.