I see, maybe I'm biased there because I don't have that much experience about people going random and people picking civ in aoc and I thought you couldn't repeat, so the difference with full random is that in full random, you can get the same civ as someone else going random?
I wish they can...
Random button is OK (tks devs) , what is not OK is the random civ pick, how many months have passed and we still not have a properly working random pick like in aoc? It's so annoying to get the same civ as you team/opponent when you go randon, what is the purpose of full random then...
This opens an interesting topic : should streamers watch their behavior because of what their followers can do?
If I'm not mistaken, some time ago, Nacho/River got banned from voobly because he used bad words against Black which lead into bashing against him.
This is more or less the same...
So the rules of the tournament become "win twice to WWP for 4k$" and that's where it seems unfair (what OP is criticising) because WWP only needs to win once for 2K$ or twice for 4K$, but again, it's the money from their sponsor and he can put the rules he want, everyone is free to accept them.
Can you keep that rating using more generic civs, like teutons or celts? I love this strat but I know how annoying it is so I try to avoid. In tg is pretty op but also easy to stop.
Yes, sometimes he plays huns, but most of the time, he spend the whole game talking about how you and your family are nice people and deserve love and gratitude from the world
Step 1: pick Persians, 6 vills on food, 6 on wood, 3 more vills to food, send 6 fwd vills from food and sneak a tc on Britons, kill tc.
Step 2: send all your vills to khmer and douche him aswell
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.