Metals are always going to better than stone when used as weapons no matter what spin you try to put on it, they used stone because they were a stone age civilization. Eurasian civilization was millennia's more advanced than Mesoamerican civilization in almost every single way.
Their...
I'm sorry but reading wikipedia articles does not make you an expert. It wasn't that steel "sucked" and obsidian was better, they just didn't know how to use metals in the way that more advanced civilizations did.
You are talking out of your ass, any metal or hard stone can be made "one-time" sharp. The only reason they were used by the Aztecs is because they were a stone age civilization who had almost no knowledge of metallurgy.
Cysion really messed up by only supporting Gameranger at launch date, seems everyone (The AoC community, not noobs on Gameranger) has totally lost interest in AoFE.
What does Cysion expect to happen when he refused to give a copy to the site where 99% of the community plays (Not the random noobs of Gameranger)? Cysion needs to keep his ego in check and try to remember he claims this is a community project, not a Gameranger exclusive.
Re: [Voobly] Support for Age of Empires II: Forgotten Empire
Damn I was looking forward to playing some multiplayer games of this tomorrow, Cysion just needs to suck up his ego and realise most of the community are not interested in playing on Gameranger...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.