How are you people?
So, lately a lot of discussion has been going on about how the pool map eradicated "arena clowns" and other type of one-mappers that had an elo that wasn't real at all, due to only being good in one map.
That's why I like the current system. Randomness favours skills (and fun).
The problem is it brought a far worse thing:
Civ-picking try-harders
Every one is picking the best civ available. Italian in islands, persians in mediterranean, mongols in Serengeti
Why I can't play random civ anymore? I mean I keep playing to the same civs and loosing to people I wouldn't if it was not about the civ advantage. Is suuuuper boring. It's not about winning or losing, ks about fairness and facing the same civ over and over again.
That's why I would like an "only random" button. No pick civ. That way, civ pickers can play between them, and we can go playing randomness again
What are your thoughts?
P. S.: btw, this happens in all levels. I'm 1200 in 1v1, so it's not this guys are trying to enter the top 100
So, lately a lot of discussion has been going on about how the pool map eradicated "arena clowns" and other type of one-mappers that had an elo that wasn't real at all, due to only being good in one map.
That's why I like the current system. Randomness favours skills (and fun).
The problem is it brought a far worse thing:
Civ-picking try-harders
Every one is picking the best civ available. Italian in islands, persians in mediterranean, mongols in Serengeti
Why I can't play random civ anymore? I mean I keep playing to the same civs and loosing to people I wouldn't if it was not about the civ advantage. Is suuuuper boring. It's not about winning or losing, ks about fairness and facing the same civ over and over again.
That's why I would like an "only random" button. No pick civ. That way, civ pickers can play between them, and we can go playing randomness again
What are your thoughts?
P. S.: btw, this happens in all levels. I'm 1200 in 1v1, so it's not this guys are trying to enter the top 100