The people asking for DQ everywhere are just pathetic.
Lamer never win, remember this Win Kon Ku
its pointless reply for him. this guy take political in aoc game .blame every chinese plaer, if u active in aoczone u will know that, just ignore him.Lamer never win, remember this Win Kon Ku
What's wrong with you? Both Win Kon Ku vs ACCM didn't realise they use the wrong map again, it's ACCM's fault too.Why just keep attacking Win Kon Ku.
and Win Kon ku is willing to replay with ACCM. But it's admins who won't accept the 3rd set proposal.
The tournament is moving on, you should too.
Comon, we all know he is going to win the next game, thats why i ssaid the score would be 3:1........ Even if he had 2AL, he would win 3:2........If it is 3-0 and he loses the game he restarted twice it would be 3-1? You must be amazing at Maths! :DNah, imo, in worst case, he would lose that game he restarted twice, score would still be 3:1 anyway 11RiuT used 2 restarts for nomad? He says re and resigns in both nomad re games. If yes, he should be DQed, because he broke the rules more significantly than Dziamdziak (for example).
"You may use no more than one restart per map. That means that if you've used one restart for G1, and still have a restart left, you are not allowed to use another restart for the G1." (18. rule)
Nah, imo, in worst case, he would lose that game he restarted twice, score would still be 3:1 anyway 11[/quote]RiuT used 2 restarts for nomad? He says re and resigns in both nomad re games. If yes, he should be DQed, because he broke the rules more significantly than Dziamdziak (for example).
"You may use no more than one restart per map. That means that if you've used one restart for G1, and still have a restart left, you are not allowed to use another restart for the G1." (18. rule)
Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
bvirus had to face jordan if he didn't lose to fedex.Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
11
+1
just look at the brackets.. top tyrant members can all reach the finals without facing eachother before, unlike other players from top leagues.
Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
11
+1
just look at the brackets.. top tyrant members can all reach the finals without facing eachother before, unlike other players from top leagues.
bvirus had to face jordan if he didn't lose to fedex.Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
11
+1
just look at the brackets.. top tyrant members can all reach the finals without facing eachother before, unlike other players from top leagues.
And, do you see RVK guys fight each others in bracket too? I don't see any RVK vs RVK.
Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
11
+1
just look at the brackets.. top tyrant members can all reach the finals without facing eachother before, unlike other players from top leagues.
Rules dont apply to Tyrants guys. They are the sponsors.
11
+1
just look at the brackets.. top tyrant members can all reach the finals without facing eachother before, unlike other players from top leagues.
No **** dude.... thats because they are all top seeds of their brackets. You are saying players like slam stark and paladin deserve a number 1 over daut jordan viper and riut?
No thats not what i'm saying. What i mean is, that it should be totally random brackets. So if viper gets faced with jordan in qualification round then so be it.
I know what you're all thinking and that you want the best to face in the finals, but thats not fair or how it supposed to be.
And replies like: this is the stupids respond or that i shouldnt share poorly ideas. or lavie head that needs some attention with her post.
Get over it geeks.
Im just saying tourneys should be fair and completly random.