Are you sure? This post spam stream of consciousness says otherwise.
Lol I could condense it all into 1 post but it loses its effect.much like your posts.I'm all about getting my point across without
cramming too much into an atheists head.
Are you sure? This post spam stream of consciousness says otherwise.
You may be good at powerlifting, but you haven't studied enough to know what it means to know something. It is very simple minded to believe something just because it is written in some book without proof or indeed any form of reasoning behind it. All you said so far is basically "god exists because it is written in the bible".
I just disagree with your claim that science favours the existence of god. I am actually not an atheist, I think we simply don't know whether God exists, and I don't think one has to be ashamed of not knowing this or indeed anything. As I said, it is very hard to arrive at solid knowledge. The existence of god is one of those questions (like the origin of life, the nature of consciousness) that we cannot hope to solve in the next few years (or better centuries....).
I'm looking at my cat as I post.he's a fine animal.I love patting him and it gives me pleasure to see him offer his tummy for further rubbing.he's a finely tuned animal that kills everything smaller.lol.I don't believe such a finely tuned animal could come about by chance.I see design there.you may not but that's because your brain isn't tuned to see design in creation.
All animals look designed from the outside. Some even are. I dont know about cats but dogs are designed by humans (atleast recently, the first steps from wolf to dog began perhaps naturally). Humans used evolution tho.
There are many examples of animals who still have historical traits from ancestors that are now redundant, whales sometimes have hind legs and all whales still have bones on the inside that remind us of hind legs. Many more examples can be found. Look them up or don't and just reply 4 times on how your cat looks designed and therefore is designed.
11 @evolutionary biology being a fairy tale while a man carrying two of every animal on earth in a wooden boat is Truth.
What I said is correct - why wouldn't I?I bet you felt really smart writing that
It is totally normal to come to the conclusion to not have incest when children out of those relationships have a very high risk to suffer for their entire life, why I need religion for that, is a mystery to me.
What you described there sound for me how Northcoreans describe Kim Yong Un.
There is no need to have a god to come to moral conclusions.
Even within religion morality has changed over the last 2000 years, at first marriage was undivorcable, now many christians don't care anymore.
Priests had to be virgins, now half of the christians think this is stupid rule.
Many rules from the old testament are deeply immoral and include the killing of people, a thing western worlds has mainly abolished.
Many religious societies had deeply immoral standards, they allowed sex with children or rape of women, they allowed multi marriages etc.
To your last part:
You can't argue that unreligious people caused violence, because they were atheists, while deeply religous people commited warcrimes for a thousand year in the name of their believes.
Also nazi ideology might have used darwinism to explain their superiority, but they misused it, a sientist would have never come to their concluions as they had zero sientific background.
The hatred towards jews did not come from darwinism it came from a hatred that christians had towards jews for almost 2000 years at that time.