Because they are a cavalry civ?Actually why Sicilians already should have strong knights in the first place
Patently false. Pikes and halbs are still cost effective counters. Stop your lieing.Pikes do nothing
As rhe one saying they should be rebalanced its part of your job to provide those rebalances. Stop shoving it on someone else.Of course if the devs pay attention to this issue and decided to remove the 50% less damage and remove the 100% build for tcs or castles and nerf it and nerf Hauberk and 1st crusade then I don't mind to buff them else where
It's stuff like this that gets you mocked.
Dude people have literally pointed out issues with your balance threads time after time. Stop lieing.No one tried and made threads about balance and if they did they will be attacked
I've literally done it more times then I care to count.
The fact that I have to point out stuff like "you can't nerf balanced civs without compensation" is a good example of that.
You nerf balanced civs because you don't like their bonuses.
Case in point you wanr to nerf lithuanians and say the relic bonus is bad.
Lets compare to malians farimba.
Farimba applies ro the entire stable.
Farimba cannot be lost
Farimba provides +5.
Lithuanians relics can be lost.
Applies only to knights and the leitis.
Provides a max of +4.
Has to be worked for.
Literally the only advantage of the relic is available earlier. And yet I don't see you up in arms about farimba.
Based on your logic you should be complaining endlessly about that. But not a peep.
Even hera says lithuanians aren't Uber good and are just above average.
Yeah they start with 150 food. Literally the only eco bonus they have. Look how much they struggle in late Feudal and early castle age.
Yeah their skirms are very good. But thry aren't going to win you a game.
Yeah their Pikes are fast. They also lack 1 armor and 2 attack. They arebt top tier anymore.
The leitis? Only good against melee civs. Useless against archers. High food cost prevents massing in castle age. Yeah it beats paladins and boyars. Know what else does? Halbs. And far cheaper too.
You even complain about their cav archers. Yeah they are good in a pinch but they aren't going to hold up against other cav archer civs abd aren't cost effective against archers. Whens rhe last time you actually saw a pro use them to considerable effect?
Last edited: