AoEZone - The International Age of Empires Community AoEZone - The International Age of Empires Community
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Help
  • What's new
    New posts New media New media comments New resources New profile posts Latest activity Help
  • Calendar
    Monthly Weekly Agenda Archive Help
  • Groups
    Public Events
  • AoEZone
    Menu Home A Guide for Beginners AoE On Twitch AoE On YouTube AoE2 Hall of Fame Feedback and Suggestions Support AoEZone Help
    Shortcuts General Discussion Community Café Questions and Answers Chat and Chit-chat Articles and Guides Resources and Downloads Live Streaming and Videos Foro Publico (Español) Fórum Público (Brasil) Age Of Empires Clans AoE II DE Leaderboards MS Zone Rating History
    Tournaments T90 Titans League Season 3 Nations Cup 2023 Rage Forest 4 Blue Carbon Cup King of the Desert V General Tournament Discussion Current Tournaments Recurring Series Past Tournaments
    Recorded Games Search for Games Daily Games Expert Games Deathmatch Custom Scenario Classic Games Map Database
Log in
Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
  • Latest activity
  • Tournaments
  • Help
  • Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
AoEZone - The International Age of Empires Community AoEZone - The International Age of Empires Community
Menu
Install the app
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Menu

Home
A Guide for Beginners
AoE On Twitch
AoE On YouTube
AoE2 Hall of Fame
Feedback and Suggestions
Support AoEZone
Help

Shortcuts

General Discussion
Community Café
Questions and Answers
Chat and Chit-chat
Articles and Guides
Resources and Downloads
Live Streaming and Videos
Foro Publico (Español)
Fórum Público (Brasil)
Age Of Empires Clans
AoE II DE Leaderboards
MS Zone Rating History

Tournaments

T90 Titans League Season 3
Nations Cup 2023
Rage Forest 4
Blue Carbon Cup
King of the Desert V
General Tournament Discussion
Current Tournaments
Recurring Series
Past Tournaments

Recorded Games

Search for Games
Daily Games
Expert Games
Deathmatch
Custom Scenario
Classic Games
Map Database

Members online

  • BelarusOLADUSHEK
  • GermanyThe_Philos
  • SwitzerlandRacerFXX
  • Netherlandsnimanoe
Total: 70 (members: 6, guests: 64)

Today's birthdays

  • puma
  • Recurring Series
  • T90 Series
  • (2023) T90 Titans League S2

T90 Titans League - Season 2

  • Thread starter United Kingdomjbr_aoe
  • Start date Dec 30, 2022
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
  • Dec 30, 2022
  • Replies: 110
TTL_S2_banner.jpg


The first S-Tier event of 2023 is coming - T90 Titans League is back!



The T90 Titans League is a recurring league which aims to provide a consistent high level stage for pro players to hone their skills, and give newcomers a chance to prove their ability and advance into the upper echelon of players.

Season 2 will begin on 2nd January with 5 weeks of round robins before getting into the playoff round. Players will be placed into ‘pots’ based on their previous placement within T90 Titans League. They will then be randomly drawn, with one player from each pot in each group.

The draw took place on Tuesday 27th December at ~21GMT here.

The groups will be:

Platinum League:

Group AGroup BGroup CGroup D
VinchesterMbLHeraTheViper
NicovLiereyyJordanVillese
DauTMr YoCapochTatoh
ACCMBacTmiguelBarles
ValasDrackenGanjiSitaux
RunningDarkKingstoneSebastian

Gold League:

Group AGroup BGroup CGroup D
slamclassicprodogaoDragonstar
BadBoysaymynameSongSongVivi
FreakinAndySobekmargougouF1Re
DanielrepardNiliLyx/iBUYPOWER
Hearttt/JibatongWhocl/GabiD3rp/BiryLaaaaaN/PhillipHJS
Bad Koala/WhitecourtMihai/El MatadorOvertaken/HoangSomero/Hope


Prize Money

The prize pool of $22,500 has been sponsored by Microsoft.

Platinum League: $17,300
1st place: $2,100
2nd place: $1,400
3rd & 4th place: $1,000
5th - 8th place: $500
9th - 12th place: $200
13th - 24th place: $150

Plus $40 per game won in the group stage (a maximum of $600 if you win all 15 games)

Gold League: $5,200
Group Winner: $180
Playoff Winner: $150
Playoff Loser: $115
4th in Group: $80
5th in Group: $60
6th in Group: $40

Plus $15 per game won in the group stage

Schedule

Platinum League


Group Stage: Jan 2nd - Feb 5th
Round 1: Jan 2nd - Jan 8th
Round 2: Jan 9th - Jan 15th
Round 3: Jan 16th - Jan 22nd
Round 4: Jan 23rd - Jan 29th
Round 5: Jan 30th - Feb 5th

Playoffs: Feb 6th - Feb 12th
Ro12: Feb 9th
Quarterfinals: Feb 10th
Semifinals: Feb 11th
Final: Feb 12th

Gold League

Group Stage: Jan 2nd - Feb 5th
Round 1: Jan 2nd - Jan 8th
Round 2: Jan 9th - Jan 15th
Round 3: Jan 16th - Jan 22nd
Round 4: Jan 23rd - Jan 29th
Round 5: Jan 30th - Feb 5th

Playoffs: Feb 6th - Feb 12th
Deciders: Feb 7th & Feb 8th


Players will be given a large degree of flexibility over scheduling. If they wish to stream their POV, they will be required to play during predetermined slots. These slots will be at 16GMT, 18GMT and 20GMT on Mondays, Thursdays and Saturdays.
If players are unable to play in an available slot, they may play private games, with no pov streaming allowed and the recorded games will be broadcast at another time.

There will be open casting during these timeslots (and of published recs at anytime).

Maps

T90 Titans League Season 2 will feature:

Acropolis
Arabia
Arena
Cross by TheMadCADer
Fortified Clearing by Chrazini
Fortress (Regicide)
Ghost Lake
Kilimanjaro
Nomad
Scandinavia
Shoals by Chrazini

Start practicing today by downloading the map pack here or by searching for “T90 Titans League Season 2 - Map Pack” in the in-game mod workshop.

The map pack is edited and maintained by T-West.

Handbook available here.
 
Last edited: Dec 30, 2022
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Blaubaer, Funito, LeoMontero and 9 others
Click to expand...
jbr_aoe
Written by

United Kingdomjbr_aoe

Known Member · 34
  • Messages
    64
  • Reaction score
    143
  • Points
    48
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5

Go to page

Next Last
L
  • LithuaniaLokalo

  • Jan 31, 2023
  • #51
Davion said:
Can you add this site under TTL's Additional Contents section?
TTL Stataphracts
Click to expand...
This works so smoothly, noice

1675161642552.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: monoclerie and Davion
T
  • United KingdomThe Pigdog

  • Jan 31, 2023
  • #52
Another great season already, full of some hugely memorable sets. Really been enjoying the content and every single person in Platinum has shown they ‘deserve’ to be there irrespective of relegation outcomes.

Surprised that the small number of individuals who behaved dishonourably at the denouement of Gold season one avoided censure, but equally it’s nice to see the spirit of forgiveness alive and well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeoMontero and Shakal
monoclerie
  • Francemonoclerie

  • Feb 3, 2023
  • #53
Spoilers :
.
.
.
.
.
.
Vinchester going to gold League ! Big surprise for me as he seems a top 4 or top 5 player ... Hope he is not to dissapointed and can come back in platinium next Time !
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeoMontero
dodageka
  • Germanydodageka

  • Feb 4, 2023
  • #54
monoclerie said:
Spoilers :
.
.
.
.
.
.
Vinchester going to gold League ! Big surprise for me as he seems a top 4 or top 5 player ... Hope he is not to dissapointed and can come back in platinium next Time !
Click to expand...
And Nicov and Capoch as well. I think that’s crazy but also really cool to see how close the top players are with respect to their skill level. Also super hyped for Ganji and Valas both securing a top 12 spot. And from what it seems like Heart and LaN will be in the next Platinum League - also hyped for that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: monoclerie
dogao
  • Brazildogao

  • Feb 4, 2023
  • #55
Jajajajajjaajajajajaj 2nd division players
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: amazing_knight, 1of4kind, Leonidas91 and 8 others
T
  • FinlandTopperHarley

  • Feb 4, 2023
  • #56
What an outstanding performance by ACCM recently, already 3rd in tournament elo atm which says a lot.

We might have a new S-tier tournament winner on the horizon
 
  • Like
Reactions: otw_Da, Akkal and nimanoe
Davion
  • VietnamDavion

  • Feb 5, 2023
  • #57
oozkan said:
I hope SongSong destroys him.
Click to expand...
Congrats on your dream becoming real in the sweetest way possible
 
  • Like
Reactions: oozkan
ecoflow
  • Bahamasecoflow

  • Feb 5, 2023
  • #58
Good stuff add michi to it
 
IYIyTh
  • United StatesIYIyTh

  • Feb 6, 2023
  • #59
The lizard slithers by! One fortress game I thought he should have won from still being in it too! Running secures next season appearance!

also, lulz at the people complaining about closed maps when most of the arabia matches have a larger-than-arena sized pali-building wall by feudal age.

HONK HONK
 
C
  • UnknownCuth

  • Feb 6, 2023
  • #60
F1re and saymyname relegated from Gold is yikes.

Very cool to see Sobek and Andy advancing. I really like this format.
 
Timotheus_
  • IrelandTimotheus_

  • Feb 7, 2023
  • #61
First off: I have been loving this tournament. I love seeing the different combinations of players and it has been really exciting.

Ones of the things that doesn't sit well with me is the case of LaaaaaN in the gold league. Despite winning all his games in the group stage, he doesn't automatically qualify.

Now, in the scheme of things, I quite like the rules on how players are ranked in the group (games won-sets one – head to head-etc). However, I would like to see a change similar to what happens in the Six Nations Rugby tournament whereby if a team (player) wins all their matches, they get a bonus 3 points. Just feels more right to me, that if a player gets a clean sweep, there is some additionally bonus.

What do people think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeoMontero, AkeNo, Snizl and 12 others
T90Official
  • United StatesT90Official

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #62
Timotheus_ said:
First off: I have been loving this tournament. I love seeing the different combinations of players and it has been really exciting.

Ones of the things that doesn't sit well with me is the case of LaaaaaN in the gold league. Despite winning all his games in the group stage, he doesn't automatically qualify.

Now, in the scheme of things, I quite like the rules on how players are ranked in the group (games won-sets one – head to head-etc). However, I would like to see a change similar to what happens in the Six Nations Rugby tournament whereby if a team (player) wins all their matches, they get a bonus 3 points. Just feels more right to me, that if a player gets a clean sweep, there is some additionally bonus.

What do people think?
Click to expand...

A fair point & observation. This definitely wasn’t a situation I thought we’d realistically encounter and so no rules or exceptions were made. I can’t promise anything specifically right now but I can say it’ll be something we think over for future seasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _srini_IVIaIVIa_, Snizl, Socksyy and 3 others
L
  • LithuaniaLokalo

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #63
IYIyTh said:
also, lulz at the people complaining about closed maps when most of the arabia matches have a larger-than-arena sized pali-building wall by feudal age.

HONK HONK
Click to expand...
Your baiting attempt is low even for your standards....
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowEloNobody
D
  • Czech RepublicDracKeN

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #64
Timotheus_ said:
First off: I have been loving this tournament. I love seeing the different combinations of players and it has been really exciting.

Ones of the things that doesn't sit well with me is the case of LaaaaaN in the gold league. Despite winning all his games in the group stage, he doesn't automatically qualify.

Now, in the scheme of things, I quite like the rules on how players are ranked in the group (games won-sets one – head to head-etc). However, I would like to see a change similar to what happens in the Six Nations Rugby tournament whereby if a team (player) wins all their matches, they get a bonus 3 points. Just feels more right to me, that if a player gets a clean sweep, there is some additionally bonus.

What do people think?
Click to expand...
Mathematically this guarantees that whoever wins all 5 matches is automatically first. Not sure it would be fair - someone goes 4x 3:0 + 1:2, other wins 5x 2:1 and ends 1st.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LowEloNobody, Shakal and Springoftheking
kalpit00
  • United Stateskalpit00

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #65
DracKeN said:
Mathematically this guarantees that whoever wins all 5 matches is automatically first. Not sure it would be fair - someone goes 4x 3:0 + 1:2, other wins 5x 2:1 and ends 1st.
Click to expand...
wasn't this always going to be an issue if we count map wins as the main ranking criteria? I think if we are going by map wins, the notion of "winning sets" should not be important, rather just focus on winning any and every map
 
  • Like
Reactions: LmScar12
D
  • Czech RepublicDracKeN

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #66
kalpit00 said:
wasn't this always going to be an issue if we count map wins as the main ranking criteria? I think if we are going by map wins, the notion of "winning sets" should not be important, rather just focus on winning any and every map
Click to expand...
I think the format is actually fine the way it is now. Winning 2:1 over someone still gives you big advantage compared to that person. Extra game won + first 2 tiebreakers is pretty huge given that most players end between 6-9 points. I know Feanor mentions other situation, but Vivi won more games, he got rewarded for getting plenty of 3:0s. If you'd then give LaN points for winning all sets, then it's making it irrelevant whether they played 3:0 or 2:1 against other players in their group. So far TTL is really well fitting the theme that every single game has massive value (look at Platinum A), that would go against it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicchio, _srini_IVIaIVIa_, Chatusilis_III and 4 others
Timotheus_
  • IrelandTimotheus_

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #67
DracKeN said:
Mathematically this guarantees that whoever wins all 5 matches is automatically first. Not sure it would be fair - someone goes 4x 3:0 + 1:2, other wins 5x 2:1 and ends 1st.
Click to expand...
(The 3 bonus points from the 6 Nations is chosen that way to ensure winning all 5 matches ensure auto first placement, which I agree with. And here we have 6 players.)

Personally, I am more inclined the other way. Going 4x 3:0 + 1:2 gives more prize money for winning games, which is well deserved. But it seems wrong, when trying to duplicate an "e-sport" league structure, that you do not win (the pool) if you win all your sets (compare this to sports where it is a binary W/L with no bonus points allocated). Beating every other player in the group > winning more games, since to do so, you would need to beat the 4x 3:0 person.
DracKeN said:
I think the format is actually fine the way it is now. Winning 2:1 over someone still gives you big advantage compared to that person. Extra game won + first 2 tiebreakers is pretty huge given that most players end between 6-9 points. I know Feanor mentions other situation, but Vivi won more games, he got rewarded for getting plenty of 3:0s. If you'd then give LaN points for winning all sets, then it's making it irrelevant whether they played 3:0 or 2:1 against other players in their group. So far TTL is really well fitting the theme that every single game has massive value (look at Platinum A), that would go against it.
Click to expand...
I mean, I agree with the general format for the rest of the placements (ordering criteria). I am only referring to the singularity of winning ALL games in a group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vossn
L
  • United StatesLowEloNobody

  • Feb 8, 2023
  • #68
I much prefer the importance of map wins over set wins. If you prioritize set wins, then there is an incentive for players to draft / play their civs in a way that optimizes towards winning sets (reducing the importance of the 3rd game).
In the current format, every single game matters, and players have to balance drafts & civs for all of the maps in the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicchio, Koito_Yuu, Chatusilis_III and 4 others
JoshuaR
  • United StatesJoshuaR

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #69
I prefer set wins in general. But I prefer map wins every once in a while for the hell of it and to change it up.

Basically I'm just happy.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: LeoMontero and Koito_Yuu
S
  • FinlandSpringoftheking

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #70
In this format I prefer game wins, but if a player wins all his sets in his group, extra points for this achievement could be awarded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timotheus_
kalpit00
  • United Stateskalpit00

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #71
Springoftheking said:
In this format I prefer game wins, but if a player wins all his sets in his group, extra points for this achievement could be awarded.
Click to expand...
That breaks the point system though. We are considering game/map wins as the primary ranking criteria. Every map win is a point, so naturally the one who wins most games out of the 15 games (5 Play All 3s) will be ranked first.

It's not mathematically possible to now add points to this from "set" wins and come to a fair conclusion. What will happen is you will have players who won more games/maps in total, but not as many sets as someone else, and the other player will add additional points due to his set win and go above someone with lesser total maps won out of the 15.

Currently, set wins are only used as tie breakers for head-to-heads, like if someone has the same total map wins as another but won the set between them, they are ranked above, which makes sense.
 
archxeon
  • Nepalarchxeon

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #72
If one person has 10-5 record but wins all sets and second person has a 12-3 record by losing a single set, can we definitely say the first player is better than second? Should the first player be given 3 (or any number) extra points so that we can reward him for winning all sets? Is it better to be consistently above average or be amazing with some rare flaws?

If the answer is not clear, we should stick to what we have now for two reasons:
1) Awarding extra points for set wins will devalue each game and 3rd games may get less competitive/interesting.
2) Almost every other tournament values set wins (since they are "best of n"), so this is a different setting which keeps things interesting.

I could argue that set wins should not be considered at all but the only reason I think its still good to keep it is because civs and maps are drafted for a set. So, you are somewhat constrained by decisions made for that set. So you must be rewarded for better strategic decisions within that set and not just overall gameplay within each game.
 
Last edited: Feb 9, 2023
  • Like
Reactions: LmScar12 and Shakal
F
  • United StatesFreezing_Point

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #73
No disrespect to him, but I think the fact that LaN lost his playoff set 3-1 serves as a pretty strong vindication of the idea that someone who wins all their sets shouldn't necessarily be made the winner of their group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: monoclerie, The Bloodless and LowEloNobody
Timotheus_
  • IrelandTimotheus_

  • Feb 9, 2023
  • #74
archxeon said:
So for example, if one person has 10-5 record but won all sets. Second person has a 12-3 record losing a single set. Can we definitely say the first player is better than second? Should the first player be given 3 (or any number) extra points so that we can reward him for winning all sets? Is it better to be consistently above average or be amazing with some rare flaws?
If the answer is not clear, we should stick to what we have now.
For two reasons,
1) Awarding extra points for set wins, will devalue each game and 3rd games may get less competitive/interesting.
2) Almost every other tournament values set wins (since they are "best of n"), so this is a different setting that keeps it interesting.

I could argue that set wins should not be considered at all but the only reason I think its still good to keep it is because civs and maps are drafted for a set. So, you are somewhat constrained by decisions made for that set. So you must be rewarded for better strategic decisions within that set and not just overall gameplay within each game.
Click to expand...
"Can we definitely say the first player is better than second?" From a purely sporting criteria, I would say yes. Being consistent is the hardest thing I would say in sport. That is why it is so difficult to win a world cup (rugby/football/etc). You see some teams hammering others, and then they lose and are out. Being able to beat every other team I would argue is more impressive.

Thus, I would say absolutely to reward someone for winning all sets, as to do so, he needs to beat the other high achiever… while also beating everyone else.

Remember that this is not awarding points for set wins generically, but only kicks in at the 5-0 stage, so it's no something that you can be lazy about. As I said, I quite like the fact that in general its map wins > set wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vossn
archxeon
  • Nepalarchxeon

  • Feb 10, 2023
  • #75
Timotheus_ said:
"Can we definitely say the first player is better than second?" From a purely sporting criteria, I would say yes. Being consistent is the hardest thing I would say in sport. That is why it is so difficult to win a world cup (rugby/football/etc). You see some teams hammering others, and then they lose and are out. Being able to beat every other team I would argue is more impressive.

Thus, I would say absolutely to reward someone for winning all sets, as to do so, he needs to beat the other high achiever… while also beating everyone else.

Remember that this is not awarding points for set wins generically, but only kicks in at the 5-0 stage, so it's no something that you can be lazy about. As I said, I quite like the fact that in general its map wins > set wins.
Click to expand...
I totally understand your point(s).

However, what I am advocating for (and what I like about the current system) is that each game is a different "match". So, if someone wins 3-0, they actually won 3 matches and not 1 set. So if we forget about the concept of a set, then 12-3 always beats 10-5 regardless of how many "sets" they won. Heck, the number of games played between players could be "even" in the current format and things wouldn't change much. However, as I mentioned above, since civs and maps are chosen for a set, giving a certain bonus for head to head set win is fine. And thats where the sets won tie-breaker can be used (and it has already been used).

And what you said about other sports is true in an event like world cups. But this is a league format. And the consistency here is not between sets but between each game. You win more games means you consistently win "games".
 
Last edited: Feb 11, 2023
  • Like
Reactions: Koito_Yuu, LmScar12, Timotheus_ and 3 others
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Remove ads? Become a premium member
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Time

Your time
G M T
Your zone

Calendar

Today's events
Blue Carbon Cup WB Final
Today 22:00 (GMT +01:00)
dogao vs. Margougou Bo7

AoE Live Streams

There are in total 104 streamers online
Click here for details
MembTV
Age of Empires II 2326 viewers
IamCristinini
Age of Empires II 1884 viewers
Dave_AoE
Age of Empires II 1273 viewers
Beastyqt
Age of Empires IV 699 viewers
TaToHAoE
Age of Empires II 618 viewers
JonSlow_
Age of Empires II 517 viewers
OGN_EMPIRES
Age of Empires II 318 viewers
sebastian2002
Age of Empires II 131 viewers
GoKuAoE
Age of Empires II 80 viewers
Offico
Age of Empires II 79 viewers
kasvaoe
Age of Empires II 77 viewers
Pilsen_aoe
Age of Empires IV 68 viewers
JuliianK
Age of Empires III 63 viewers
kauP
Age of Empires IV 59 viewers
Mr_Grin_
Age of Empires II 48 viewers
paradox303
Age of Empires II 46 viewers
Schlumpf666aoe
Age of Empires II 46 viewers
ciskhan_
Age of Empires II 46 viewers
TheodorichTV
Age of Empires IV 43 viewers
bean__dip
Age of Empires II 38 viewers
gks_aoe
Age of Empires IV 38 viewers
VortexReload
Age of Empires IV 30 viewers
don_artie
Age of Empires IV 29 viewers
sorentine
Age of Empires II 26 viewers
eagleeyesmaloney
Age of Empires III 26 viewers
OLADUSHEK__
Age of Empires II 23 viewers
Askallad
Age of Empires IV 20 viewers
brother_leo_
Age of Empires IV 20 viewers
choom_aoe
Age of Empires IV 18 viewers
Terz_AoE
Age of Empires II 17 viewers
Unrestriicted
Age of Empires II 14 viewers
maumauFTW
Age of Empires II 14 viewers
Nautilus_90
Age of Empires IV 14 viewers
Mr_Bramboy
Age of Empires III 14 viewers
MllePeps
Age of Empires IV 13 viewers
MrOsoVC8
Age of Empires II 10 viewers
Der_Deem
Age of Empires IV 10 viewers
arzachaoe
Age of Empires II 9 viewers
jiglypuf622
Age of Empires IV 9 viewers
Chotiik
Age of Empires IV 9 viewers
SyMess
Age of Empires II 8 viewers
MagdeburgeSports
Age of Empires IV 8 viewers
coolcaptainlee
Age of Empires IV 8 viewers
PiniwiniLive
Age of Empires II 7 viewers
PhilFerdinand
Age of Empires IV 7 viewers
winterzcold_
Age of Empires 7 viewers
t1gas019
Age of Empires II 6 viewers
EsotericCloudSurfer
Age of Empires IV 6 viewers
kumanaoe
Age of Empires II 5 viewers
drasah_x
Age of Empires II 5 viewers
Mascro23
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
TheKiiwii
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
DJWookie87
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
yeda11
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
PosterNutbag1
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
F1rstlady33
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
Tigerrrr90
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
multiples_siestes
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
guillaume_dby
Age of Empires IV 4 viewers
Trenie
Age of Empires IV 4 viewers
LiberaleGamingAllianz
Age of Empires III 4 viewers
glenn_thunderer
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
feshark
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
oriingamers
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
benjaiper
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
BoellerOne
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
xvastolord31x
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
krmyth9
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
Zeus_Confi
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
lonzowall28
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
benjlike
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
flette67
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
task_france
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
Donald2016Trump
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
FogHorntv
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
LtCloFlam
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
fetine
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
aoerobot
Age of Empires 2 viewers
deadgodz420
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
7belo9
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
CT_Oso
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
vulpecula_aoe
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
seru33
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
tcssoph
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
RobertoelBruce
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
Sandroushi
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
邦各
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
jesusinacka
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
dreamcl_aoe
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
fl0w_aoe4
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
nerdycat42
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
kalevinpelikanava
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
Monkeylegitboss
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
donj1mz
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
Direnc_1
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
Aiiz1010
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
LizaaReads_
Age of Empires 1 viewers
aoedarkhorse
Age of Empires 1 viewers
spartanxelite33
Age of Empires Online 1 viewers
MrRewindThat
Age of Empires III 1 viewers
vicalvarado_tv
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
loulouping
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
Kamprrrrr
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
virabhadra7
Age of Empires III 0 viewers

Latest posts

  • L
    TG Tournaments
    • Latest: Lokalo
    • Yesterday at 11:57 PM
    General Discussion
  • paradox303
    Age of Empires II Community Awards 2023
    • Latest: paradox303
    • Yesterday at 10:15 AM
    General Discussion
  • Akkal
    3v3 League season 7 open for signups - All skill levels welcome!
    • Latest: Akkal
    • Yesterday at 8:12 AM
    General Tournament Discussion
  • Akkal
    An apology
    • Latest: Akkal
    • Yesterday at 7:49 AM
    Wololo
  • L
    A Modest Proposal - Nerf Scout Line - Oppressive Scout Line Play Ruining AOE2
    • Latest: LowEloNobody
    • Monday at 7:42 PM
    General Discussion

DE Top 5 RM 1v1

Click here for full list
Hera 2644
_Barles_ 2639
Villese 2617
GL.TheViper 2602
ACCM |AOEbuilds.com 2594

DE Top 5 RM Team Game

Click here for full list
2583
痛大师 2245
HGB_AOE 2181
chaos_2_win 2009
正义的威震天 2008

DE Top 5 Empire Wars 1v1

Click here for full list
[aM]_MbL40C_ 2053
ACCM |AOEbuilds.com 2031
Hera 1999
Yo 1964
CDUB.dogao 1935

DE Top 5 Empire Wars Team Game

Click here for full list
mYi.Sitaux 1752
__BadBoy__ 1726
ELEOS | ElNoniro 1690
Lauth3 1687
BlackRock 1668

Voobly Top 5 RM 1v1

Muhammed__ 2431
FaNTaZi___ 2301
MkD_DaCe 2215
['HD]Duc_Ngo_ 2212
BMW 2188

Voobly Top 5 RM Team Game

Gavrilka 2108
BMW 2091
JESUS 2039
['VN]DontToxic 2039
Enes_Kayi 2022

Voobly Top 5 DM 1v1

[IYIx_]The_B0ss_ 2047
Wen123 2034
[Learning]_QQV 2027
[Learning]HZS 1989
michi1 1971

Voobly Top 5 DM Team Game

Riker_ 1998
_Tech_Power_ 1970
yellowflash_ 1898
KOTL_rampage 1895
FastKnight 1887

Share

Share this page
Share
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • AoEZone Dark theme
  • English (US)
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2023 XenForo Ltd. | Style by ThemeHouse
XenPorta 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
XenAtendo 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
Top
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…