Omg this is really huge !! Love it
Same with every other tournament that is granting a spot for RBW, the next highest placed player who isn't already invited.So the 1st winner of Platinium League will get to go to Red Bull Lan tournament, but what if it's already a qualified player? The 2nd will get in?
Can someone post some information about the tournament here? There is only a facebook link and many will probably not use it.
Full announcement with all the details in the coming days.Can someone post some information about the tournament here? There is only a facebook link and many will probably not use it.
How are the 128 players of the silver league determined? Highest Rank + dropped players from gold league? Or some kind of open qualifier? Or a mix?
What happens if a top player cannot participate in a season? Can he rejoin his league in the next season or does he has to grind up from silver league?
I doubt the 24 will be entirely invited, that wouldn't make any sense.I think this is an amazing one, even though there are obv. still a lot of things we don't know yet (Mappool, Platinum/Gold Participants for 1st Season, Groups randomized or made with a seeding, Livegames or Recorded).
Only feels a bit weird that the winner gets to RBW Legacy, since that means everyone who doesn't get "invited" to the first Platinum League can't qualify for RBW this way.
Seeded by ATP rankingsI doubt the 24 will be entirely invited, that wouldn't make any sense.
It's the same as any other ranking method. I'm not against ATP rankings, but it's bad to use them entirely for any tournament. Same as with ladder rating, ATP, previous performances - inviting part of the players based on it is fine and good solution (in this particular case top 8/12/16), inviting all if it's such a major tournament is a horrible idea. I'm hoping there will be some other way to get into the tournament.Seeded by ATP rankings
In this instance, the top 48 of those who sign up will be in the 2 leagues. For next season there will be an open qualifier for the open slots after relegation.It's the same as any other ranking method. I'm not against ATP rankings, but it's bad to use them entirely for any tournament. Same as with ladder rating, ATP, previous performances - inviting part of the players based on it is fine and good solution (in this particular case top 8/12/16), inviting all if it's such a major tournament is a horrible idea. I'm hoping there will be some other way to get into the tournament.
I don't think 20k invitational tournament for 24 players is good. Sorry. And there are many good things like Gold + Silver League, T90's events are always well covered, greatly organized, etc. There are many things to be hyped for, but full Invitational event is just bad and I thought we're long over it regarding S-tier events.In this instance, the top 48 of those who sign up will be in the 2 leagues. For next season there will be an open qualifier for the open slots after relegation.
Its 48 players actually, and none of the players are invited, they are seeded by a rating system.I don't think 20k invitational tournament for 24 players is good.
I don't think what you are describing as "inviting" is what most people doIt's the same as any other ranking method. I'm not against ATP rankings, but it's bad to use them entirely for any tournament. Same as with ladder rating, ATP, previous performances - inviting part of the players based on it is fine and good solution (in this particular case top 8/12/16), inviting all if it's such a major tournament is a horrible idea. I'm hoping there will be some other way to get into the tournament.
I respect the effort put in Gold League, but it's not on the same level, it's simply a B league without the very best. So S tier 24 players league and A-/B+ tier Gold League without like top30 in the world. To ensure everyone who participates in those leagues gets prize money (even without winning a single game) isn't something I'm fan of either, but that's for another topic.Its 48 players actually, and none of the players are invited, they are seeded by a rating system.
Personally, I don't see how its very different from a 64 player (top 64 seeded from ATP in this case) single slim bracket where top 32 earn prize money, and I dont think there would be many complaints about that sort of event.
In both cases x number of players get to participate, based on a relatively arbitrary system. In one of them more would be able to contest prize placements, but the other more players are guaranteed to earn something, and has a flatter distribution.
There has to be a starting point for this league. Utilising a neutral ranking system, that has collated data on the top players performances in assorted tournaments over the past years, seems like a pretty balanced system to establish the top players. It's realistically the only viable solution. Sure you could do an open qualify for top 200 players. Top 24 go into the Platinum, Next 24 into gold and so on. But do you then seed players in that tournament? If you are how do you seed them? (That is ignoring the time constraint with spot of winner being guaranteed a place in RBW)There are 24 players seeded by a system that players can't affect anymore. That's basically invitational, the only difference is that players have to sign up themselves and like seed 25-28 might get in too, depends on the interest. I'm not defending ladder rating as it has major issues, but it would allow players to get there, right now you're saying which players will get in and which players won't.
There was actually a try to make this happen in CZ/SK community. The idea was 6 leagues, each with 10 players, each league players of similar elo play. Winners of each league would go up next season, losers drop down. While the league was succesful overall with quite a high level production for the Semifinals/Finals each season, it wasn't possible to make it in a way like a League with advancing. Some players couldn't play next season, few new players with high level joined - it wouldn't make sense to make them play vs 11x players when they were 16/2k, etc. Winners of 2nd league were still 200 points lower rated than 'loser' of 1st league and switching them would impact quality of both leagues.. Kind of a 'reccurring' tournament definitely has better chances of keeping the format, but I think it still needs to work like top12 from last season invited, remaining 12 qualifier.There's not really anything in pro-level AOE2 that is similar to the football league pyramid, I don't know if that's because sponsors or tournament hosts don't think if it would be exciting enough or if there just isn't any interest in that sort of event.
That's what she said..Omg this is really huge !! Love it