It was clear Canada played by the rules meanwhile China broke them. Therefore, it was fair admin win for Canada. Also, check this:
§3 - Respect & Fairplay
Every team member must respect their opponent. Bad behaviour (determined by staff) will result in a warning and may lead to an immediate disqualification of a whole team.
Whoop telling the Canada players to "f*** one by one" is not really respectfull, right? China is lucky not to be warned, perhaps even disqualified.
It was clear Canada played by the rules meanwhile China broke them. Therefore, it was fair admin win for Canada. Also, check this:
§3 - Respect & Fairplay
Every team member must respect their opponent. Bad behaviour (determined by staff) will result in a warning and may lead to an immediate disqualification of a whole team.
Whoop telling the Canada players to "f*** one by one" is not really respectfull, right? China is lucky not to be warned, perhaps even disqualified.
Your temper will be high too IF you think you are getting AL unfairly. Switch it around and one or two of Canadians would be acting similar.
Whoop telling the Canada players to "f*** one by one" is not really respectfull, right? China is lucky not to be warned, perhaps even disqualified.
+1..imo the rules are bad, and you should be able to kill vills with tc at any moment, and steal sheep at any moment (but not kill them.) However, according to the rules, China obviously violated them while Hera did not. Even according to the rules you are quoting, if Hera actually attempted to steal the sheep he converted, he would not have broken any rules. He did not steal those sheep by sitting under a tc, only by passing near it.
I completely agree with you.It was clear Canada played by the rules meanwhile China broke them. Therefore, it was fair admin win for Canada. Also, check this:
§3 - Respect & Fairplay
Every team member must respect their opponent. Bad behaviour (determined by staff) will result in a warning and may lead to an immediate disqualification of a whole team.
Whoop telling the Canada players to "f*** one by one" is not really respectfull, right? China is lucky not to be warned, perhaps even disqualified.
you mean the 3min 30 sec rule or villi fight in nomad is disallowed in general?I just checked for past torunaments and rules in this kind of variation go back to as far as CoT 2013 (maybe earlier, but thats what i found)and have been in every major tourney since. Starting a discussion about it now is odd
imo the rules are bad, and you should be able to kill vills with tc at any moment, and steal sheep at any moment (but not kill them.) However, according to the rules, China obviously violated them while Hera did not. Even according to the rules you are quoting, if Hera actually attempted to steal the sheep he converted, he would not have broken any rules. He did not steal those sheep by sitting under a tc, only by passing near it.
you mean the 3min 30 sec rule or villi fight in nomad is disallowed in general?I just checked for past torunaments and rules in this kind of variation go back to as far as CoT 2013 (maybe earlier, but thats what i found)and have been in every major tourney since. Starting a discussion about it now is odd
I agree, it is often unavoidable to lose vills to enemy TC on nomad. But it's similarly unavoidable at 4:00, 5:00, and afterwards as well. Why put in place a ~30 second window in which the game will completely end if you kill a vil? Is a vil so much more valuable at 3:15 compared to 3:45? Nopeimo the rules are bad, and you should be able to kill vills with tc at any moment, and steal sheep at any moment (but not kill them.) However, according to the rules, China obviously violated them while Hera did not. Even according to the rules you are quoting, if Hera actually attempted to steal the sheep he converted, he would not have broken any rules. He did not steal those sheep by sitting under a tc, only by passing near it.
I feel quite surprised seeing this comment coming from someone who played 10000 nomads. You know very well that losing a vil to one TC that early in the game is something completely unavoidable and it just puts you in a very bad situation. It's a very lame issue in nomad and this rule prevent such unfair thing happening.
imo the rules are bad, and you should be able to kill vills with tc at any moment, and steal sheep at any moment (but not kill them.) However, according to the rules, China obviously violated them while Hera did not. Even according to the rules you are quoting, if Hera actually attempted to steal the sheep he converted, he would not have broken any rules. He did not steal those sheep by sitting under a tc, only by passing near it.
I agree, it is often unavoidable to lose vills to enemy TC on nomad. But it's similarly unavoidable at 4:00, 5:00, and afterwards as well. Why put in place a ~30 second window in which the game will completely end if you kill a vil? Is a vil so much more valuable at 3:15 compared to 3:45? Nope
It's not reasonable as those sheep are initially neutral in ownership, so just because you found them first does not give you a right to kill them to prevent enemy from "stealing."imo if you get a sheep stolen and you cant steal it back killing it is reasonable
because you generally have all your vils at your tc by 3:30 after that if you go exploring and lose a vil thats kinda more the players fault
completely incorrect, in the very game we are discussing, at 3:30, hera would have a total of 1 vil at his tc. I haven't played this new nomad v2 enough to know exactly how close the vills spawn, but in vanilla nomad you would be very lucky to have all starting vills at your tc so early