I think "obvious misclick" was in quotation marks because it was quoting you.Why put obvious misclick in quotes?
Unless........you think that wasn't the case. Well......
I think "obvious misclick" was in quotation marks because it was quoting you.Why put obvious misclick in quotes?
Unless........you think that wasn't the case. Well......
That's bad sportmanship imo, implying that the opponents were unfair and questioning whether they were better just because they followed the rules.I join the tournament just to have some fun, if i'd have been in the same spot you can be 100% sure i'd have let them pick their obviously pick just because I want to win in fairness and it is the best way to show who's better. I've done it on more important tournaments ( to myself).
That's bad sportmanship imo, implying that the opponents were unfair and questioning whether they were better just because they followed the rules.
I mean it's great that you would have let them pick whatever they want, but imo you cannot critisize someone if he doesn't do the same to you.
We have seen similar situations being dealt the same way before, don't rly know what's different this time.
Well you didn't quote that so out of context...If you read the whole thread there is a guy saying that we would have done the same, and I'm giving my reasons why i'd not do it answering to that guy .
You are just implying things from what I wrote, saying that I critized them just because i'm giving my point of view. Go somewhere else to create drama.
I think Tatoh clearly specified that he would allow the opponent team to go for the pick they originally wanted to go for, to make it a fair game. Maybe read his response again?when you say that you would have done something different to "win in fairness"... I mean what do you mean with that?
But that's what I mean.I think Tatoh clearly specified that he would allow the opponent team to go for the pick they originally wanted to go for, to make it a fair game. Maybe read his response again?
That was me that said that originally, and I'm sorry for misrepresenting your position, I didn't mean to put words in your mouth.If you read the whole thread there is a guy saying that we would have done the same, and I'm giving my reasons why i'd not do it answering to that guy .
You are just implying things from what I wrote, saying that I critized them just because i'm giving my point of view. Go somewhere else to create drama.
......Tatoh team disnt lose because of chinese, rather poor performance from tatoh and bad strategy overall in the last game.
no there isnt.Saying having Bohemians = free win is 100% a fallacy, im sure there are a lot of counter examples.
Debatable, I cannot think of anything that counters Halb + Hoofnice, perhaps elite Mungaris.Saying having Bohemians = free win is 100% a fallacy, im sure there are a lot of counter examples.
lol. Wasn't it the last pick?You drafted Chinese, we thought you are familiar with them!
For you this may be the case (and there is nothing wrong with that). For others, it's a $10k tournament. You can't expect other people not to play that fully competitively. It's also not really justified to go calling it 'bad sportsmanship' and implying it shows a lack of respect. Blame the rules, not the players who play by them.For me this is (was) a fun tournament in a small community where everyone knows and respects each other. And the rule is followed in both cases, so yes giving chinese instead of bohemians is bad sportsmanship for me. If it wasnt a teamgame i would have left and give free win for sure.
But honestly I'd rather be in the team that loses with chinese than in the one that gives chinese to the opponent and wins, so i guess we are all happy and can move on.
Because what's to stop another team deciding to 'accidentally misclick' and get insight on the other team's picks (and no, I'm obviously not accusing TaToH's team of attempting to game the system)? It's an anti-cheating measure as much as anything, and, unfortunately, these tend to require fairly stringent and blanket policies.I don't get the narrative of "rules are rules so it was fair". There's always someone who applies the rules and adapt them according to the situation. In this case it was clear for everyone that Tatoh's team meant to pick Bohemians and missclicked double Brits. Why should the other team pick the civ for them instead of having some admin with common sense making the call, since it was an obvious mistake? Giving them chinese was very cheap by the other team and the tourney organisation shouldn't allow it.
Not sure about that.I think this shows very well how decisions about actions for rule breaking never should be up to the other player/team.
As soon as there is money on the line, yes there shouldn't be goodwill enforced onto the players.is that really a better rule since it leaves no space for goodwill?