i think you need set MVP in every game, not total 5 games to get only 1 MVP, so lose team still have player get mvp if their team have won 1 or 2 game. then at the end of BOA we can count who earn most MVP to set he is MVP of tournament.
Slam played a very good game 1, but Spaden carried the team (under an untouched situation)
Game 2 wasn't great from Slam, almost didn't participated on IMP till the very late, it was won with some walls and a better use of the water.
Game 3 doesn't have much to tell either, indians pkt is great, specially vs franks and persia.
I don't consider game 4 an aoe game, more like a gamble.
Game 5 Slam was holding the team almost all alone at some point, true.
I can't consider themax MVP, he had to sling on 2 games, I feel like zuppy performed better overall.
i think you need set MVP in every game, not total 5 games to get only 1 MVP, so lose team still have player get mvp if their team have won 1 or 2 game. then at the end of BOA we can count who earn most MVP to set he is MVP of tournament.
I had considered it, but although it might be clearer and fairest, i feel it wouldn't reflect the real MVP, some games are not at exhausting as others.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.