Hello guys how are you hope you are well.
I wanted to discuss with you the draft and bans system in KOTD4 from my perspective and I want to know what do you think too. In KOTD4 the system got in BO5 match 3 bans, and in BO7 it was 2 bans which is a weird decission imo becasue a draft with more civs should have more bans not less. In general I am not a fan of only 2 bans especially there are many unbalanced match ups and many unbalanced civs in the game so 3 bans or even 4 should be minimum. I feel that in a draft for BO7 match should have like 3 bans at least and even 4, but surprisingly it was only 2 bans for BO7 and the 3 bans were for BO5 and only 1 ban for BO9! The bans are good in tournaments becasue it give more balanced matches and fair play to provide the broken or unbalanced or strong civs that make the play one sided with no fun, and it gives more variety and more diversity to see more civs instead of seeing the same civs in same drafts almost every game.
So what do you think?
I wanted to discuss with you the draft and bans system in KOTD4 from my perspective and I want to know what do you think too. In KOTD4 the system got in BO5 match 3 bans, and in BO7 it was 2 bans which is a weird decission imo becasue a draft with more civs should have more bans not less. In general I am not a fan of only 2 bans especially there are many unbalanced match ups and many unbalanced civs in the game so 3 bans or even 4 should be minimum. I feel that in a draft for BO7 match should have like 3 bans at least and even 4, but surprisingly it was only 2 bans for BO7 and the 3 bans were for BO5 and only 1 ban for BO9! The bans are good in tournaments becasue it give more balanced matches and fair play to provide the broken or unbalanced or strong civs that make the play one sided with no fun, and it gives more variety and more diversity to see more civs instead of seeing the same civs in same drafts almost every game.
So what do you think?
Last edited: