It seems like some who arguing that going to the meet-up would be inconsequential have no real understanding of how epidemics work. They would benefit by seeing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kas0tIxDvrg
The ONLY way to limit the outbreak (till a vaccine is developed) is to limit contagion. And since many people who might be affected may not be demonstrating acute symptoms (typically youth), you might be putting others at risk even without knowing it when you meet them.
It's amusing how some people here are arguing that experts haven't restricted this meet-up, but literally all over the world experts have been arguing to restrict non-essential activities. What do you want them to do: look at each case and decide whether it's essential or not?
I don't usually talk too much on this forum, but on this topic I'd advice people not to keep a meet-up till the situation improves. Every epidemic has an inflection point and a point after which it dies out, so you don't have to cancel things: postponing works. But at the end, it's your rational decision.
The ONLY way to limit the outbreak (till a vaccine is developed) is to limit contagion. And since many people who might be affected may not be demonstrating acute symptoms (typically youth), you might be putting others at risk even without knowing it when you meet them.
It's amusing how some people here are arguing that experts haven't restricted this meet-up, but literally all over the world experts have been arguing to restrict non-essential activities. What do you want them to do: look at each case and decide whether it's essential or not?
I don't usually talk too much on this forum, but on this topic I'd advice people not to keep a meet-up till the situation improves. Every epidemic has an inflection point and a point after which it dies out, so you don't have to cancel things: postponing works. But at the end, it's your rational decision.