In a complicated game like this, there will always be one worst civ. It is only a desirable thing if it is also the most boring civ to play. Current situation is way better than actually having Goths as a strong, viable choice for any game. All dumb petitions to the devs only carry the risk that they will overdo it and goths become OP, resulting in everyone quitting the game within a week. This thread should be closed asap, so the devs will not read it by accident.
Wouldn't you prefer to have consistent balance changes where the 'worst civ' can change with each patch as new bonuses are given, taken away and adjusted?
This certainly sounds a better scenario than ignoring the fact that certain civs aren't competitive.
Of course we don't want another pre-patch cumans but it doesn't hurt to throw ideas around.