1) "Proof" would be in the eye of the beholder, belief in the existence of a Creator is not based in "proof" but in faith. That's the whole point.
2) Evolution has certainly not been "verified". The researches you state as verification are simple adaptations of the base DNA. Changes that come about in a species over how ever many generations you want to post up as an impressive number already existed in the base DNA and are turned off and on as easily as a switch depending on what genes are expressed.
3) The amount of years the Earth has existed is moot. Whether it be, 100 billion years or 6000 years, the conditions to form molecules requires amino acids which would be impossible in an atmosphere with oxygen because oxidation would make that scientifically impossible. Even if by chances that are of a ratio greater than all the particles in the universe to one, you would need to join these amino acids, which requires enzymes. So which came first....the protein or the protein necessary to make an enzyme...?
It is so scientifically unlikely that life "just happened" by random events, that scientists theorize that it must have come from outer space, which is called the "theory of panspermia".
The only question is "how did we get here..?" because it is obvious that life exists.
There are only two answers, a) we were created b) chance.
The quantity and quality of events that had to occur for life to begin as chance, is a larger leap in "faith" than believing that we were created.
T
Evolution is just what we call it when a species adapts over and over again, it's not some separate thing. You could replace the word evolution with "repeated adaptation" in literature if you wanted to, it just takes longer to write.
Those changes do not already exist in base DNA. What is 'base' DNA by the way? I guess you just mean DNA?
There are only 2 cells in the human body with the capacity to change their DNA without mutation: the B cell and helper T cell. Neither of these cells are gametes. So no, they didn't "already existed in the base DNA" as you say.
For the record, amino acid (peptide) based enzymes are only one subclass of enzymes (admittedly most common), there are others which are not amino acid based. Ribozymes are composed of RNA and have enzymatic functions. They have a large role in protein synthesis.
I don't understand what you mean by "the conditions to form molecules requires amino acids...". There are many non organic molecules which don't require amino acids, or any other organic component. For example in the very early universe Hydrogen molecules were present. The formation of hydrogen molecules does not require amino acids, just energy, time and the relevant elementary particles.