Camels arent really that great vs Elephants afaik, sure they do bonus damage but eles still kill them. Other then that great table
That's far too confusing for a noob (the type of player who needs this) to glance at and gain information.
Nice idea, though. A bit of design work and it might be more useful.
It's about countersystem not about micro nor outmassing Quark... Sure you can kill an elephant with 2 skirms, but there are not really an effective counter. ;-)
Well, I like the idea of the countersystem, but i have to admit, that you have to consider many factors.
For example massed castle age skirms totally shred single camels (since they don't have the inherent +2 pierce armor like knights). Cavalry archers can kill mangonels easily with some micro. Also bombard cannons are not a really good counter, super expensive and bad area of effect.
Castle age eagle warriors are terrible too, they're only useful vs monks/siege combo.
Also, it's not clear what age the units are. From looking on the units it's just castle age (except the bombard cannon)? Longswordmen are okish vs elite eagle warriors, but not a very good counter.
Camels arent really that great vs Elephants afaik, sure they do bonus damage but eles still kill them. Other then that great table
Camels arent really that great vs Elephants afaik, sure they do bonus damage but eles still kill them. Other then that great table
Well, 1 paladin kills 1 halb, but halbs still counter paladins, right? So I think there's nothing wrong with claiming camels counter elephants.
halbs aren't pop efficient eitherCamels arent really that great vs Elephants afaik, sure they do bonus damage but eles still kill them. Other then that great table
Well, 1 paladin kills 1 halb, but halbs still counter paladins, right? So I think there's nothing wrong with claiming camels counter elephants.
Mass halbs do counter paladins.
Mass camels don't counter elite elephants. Camels are not pop effective counter.