Probably this has been explained before, but why don’t we draft 21 civs each for a BO7? I’m sure I’m missing sth, but wouldn’t that be perfect to showcase all civs?
Chrazini 4 'Zone president????you should be a politician chrazini, always excellent responses no matter how hopeless the situation
Not surprising though given the way the maps are designedA pity that these semi-finals are so one sided.
with the same winners?Hopefully the finals aren't super one-sided. A repeat of BoA2 would be nice
BoA2 was better. It had better maps.
i told them like 2-3 times, dont understand why didnt do it this way. also in the bo9 they can pick 21-21, and for the last 2 games a new draft with all the bans you want.Probably this has been explained before, but why don’t we draft 21 civs each for a BO7? I’m sure I’m missing sth, but wouldn’t that be perfect to showcase all civs?
Probably this has been explained before, but why don’t we draft 21 civs each for a BO7? I’m sure I’m missing sth, but wouldn’t that be perfect to showcase all civs?
That was the same case at BoA2 and aM only won 4-3 in the Semis back then against Suomi with 14-3 Mapwins (before the finals) and Team Secret/GL finished 3rd in the Group Stage with 15-9 Mapwins (before the finals).Imo it's understable that those two semis were one sided considering that AM and GL are probably the strongest team.
We are in their voice channels, listening constantly, we are watching their point of view at all times, and we are watching their immediate surroundings on cameras. There are minor other things, but those are the primary tools. Even a spectator delay has its flaws, but we hope to combine the aforementioned and a spectator delay for the future, in hopes of boosting security even further and making each of the tools stronger by all of them being utilised simultaneously.Are you saying that there is an extra level of anti cheat being utilized in BoA3 since there is zero spec delay? I'd really like to hear about it if at all possible, as that's news to me. I am having a hard time guessing what that might be if so, would love some clarification. My present opinion is 0 spec delay in big money tourneys makes it much easier than it already is to gain an unfair edge, but I understand the reasoning is to sync with facecams.
I am unsure whether I should be flattered or offendedyou should be a politician chrazini, always excellent responses no matter how hopeless the situation
Probably this has been explained before, but why don’t we draft 21 civs each for a BO7? I’m sure I’m missing sth, but wouldn’t that be perfect to showcase all civs?
i told them like 2-3 times, dont understand why didnt do it this way. also in the bo9 they can pick 21-21, and for the last 2 games a new draft with all the bans you want.
We wanted drafts to be consistent across the tournament, which is why we kept the general draft layout the same. Allowing the players at least one ban each is something we value highly, which simply was not possible if we wanted to utilise all forty-two civilisations.I am also really surprised by this. Would have loved to see some of the under utilised civs more.
Correct me if I'm wrong, grand finals casted by Vinchester, right?
Dave is on a fishing trip - iirc from thursday to next tuesday or so. Nili is at a festival as a surprise bachelor party for Tsu_Shine. So both arent able to cast.I suppose Dave and T90 will cast together, so maybe they weren't available. And I don't think Nili will cast anyway.