Am I the only one who's not a fan of trying to balance all civs for 1v1 (pro) Arabia?
Imho it was always the charm that certain civs are very good on closed maps, water maps, fast open maps, some only perform well in team games, etc... Of course, since 90% of the tourneys are (pro) 1v1s that skews public perception a bit, and I am dreading KOTD5 in this regard, but I always was fine with Spanish being a go to Civ for 4v4 Pocket and useless for 1v1 Arabia, or Turks being super strong on Arena but probably not the best choice for other maps.
Not necessarily related to these changes, just a general question how people feel..
How are we supposed to complain about and look down on civ pickers if we deliberately allow multiple civs to be completely unviable on the most popular map?