AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Help
  • What's new
    New posts New profile posts Latest activity Help
  • Calendar
    Monthly Weekly Agenda Archive Help
  • Groups
    Public Events
  • AoEZone
    Menu Home A Guide for Beginners AoE On Twitch AoE On YouTube AoE2 Hall of Fame Feedback and Suggestions Support AoEZone Help
    Shortcuts General Discussion Community Café Questions and Answers Chat and Chit-chat Articles and Guides Resources and Downloads Live Streaming and Videos Foro Publico (Español) Fórum Público (Brasil) Age Of Empires Clans AoE II DE Leaderboards MS Zone Rating History
    Tournaments Battle of Africa 3 Red Bull Wololo: Legacy RMS Cup 2 T90 Titans League Terra Nova Duos Wallhalla General Tournament Discussion Current Tournaments Recurring Series Past Tournaments
    Recorded Games Search for Games Daily Games Expert Games Deathmatch Custom Scenario Classic Games Map Database
Log in
Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
  • Latest activity
  • Help
  • Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community
Menu
Install the app
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Menu

Home
A Guide for Beginners
AoE On Twitch
AoE On YouTube
AoE2 Hall of Fame
Feedback and Suggestions
Support AoEZone
Help

Shortcuts

General Discussion
Community Café
Questions and Answers
Chat and Chit-chat
Articles and Guides
Resources and Downloads
Live Streaming and Videos
Foro Publico (Español)
Fórum Público (Brasil)
Age Of Empires Clans
AoE II DE Leaderboards
MS Zone Rating History

Tournaments

Battle of Africa 3
Red Bull Wololo: Legacy
RMS Cup 2
T90 Titans League
Terra Nova Duos
Wallhalla
General Tournament Discussion
Current Tournaments
Recurring Series
Past Tournaments

Recorded Games

Search for Games
Daily Games
Expert Games
Deathmatch
Custom Scenario
Classic Games
Map Database

Members online

  • Hong KongHongeyKong
  • SwedenYellowLemon
  • UnknownLmScar12
  • Czech RepublicCZ_Somero
  • United Statesbengute
  • AustraliaCaptainj5
  • Indiathepitzaboy
  • New ZealandJasent
  • United KingdomTiger__Moth
Total: 41 (members: 13, guests: 28)

Today's birthdays

  • A
  • Asfaloth
  • General Tournament Discussion

AoE2 Tournament Points

  • Thread starter Australiarobo
  • Start date May 23, 2022
  • Tags
    atp tournament ranking
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Remove ads? Become a premium member......
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #1
First seen here and here and analyzed here, I'd like to present a finalized version of the ATP (AoE2 Tournament Points) rankings, which are based on the ATP system used in professional Tennis and modified to try to suit Age of Empires 2.

Before I begin, huge thanks to @Tarsiz for initially creating the spreadsheet and kickstarting the idea, @Degaussed , @TheCapybara , @King_Boo , and the rest of the GB Discord for providing feedback and suggestions as new features were implemented, and @Adico for allowing me to shamelessly steal borrow ideas from the AoE IV ATR sheet.

  • 1v1 ATP Sheet
  • TG ATP Sheet (Note this is still WiP and some features from the 1v1 sheet have not been carried over yet)

Simply put, the ATP rankings are intended to be a way to track player tournament performance and provide an alternate method for seeding them in tournaments as accurately as possible, taking into account a wide range of criteria.
Players earn points based on the end position in a tournament (more points for first, less for 33-64th) weighted by the 'modifier' of the tournament which is impacted by the size of the prize pool, number of players, number of invited players, and other restrictions.
Currently, players do not earn any points if they do not complete all of their matches, that is, they withdraw or are otherwise disqualified from an event regardless of where they actually ended up, and any matches/games that were played are not counted towards their win/loss results.

The Team game sheet has a small delay in adding features compared to the 1v1 Rankings, as I want to make sure any changes are functional and completed before spending the time duplicating them onto another sheet. There is also significantly less data (54 completed 1v1 tournaments vs 14 completed tgs) so any inference from the rankings is dubious at best. I mostly created it to see what the numbers would look like. Players only earn points if they actually participate and play in games, being on the roster is not enough.

If anyone has any feedback, ideas or suggestions please do share them.

Features include:
  • Almost all S, A, & B-Tier 1v1 tournaments since the release of DE are included. Over 200 players & 1300 tournament results included and counting!
  • Tournaments are only counted for 1 year to represent their current form, but older data is still available.
  • Match and Game win rate for most events within that time period. (some qualifiers are yet to be included)
  • Various versions of the rankings (Regular, S-Tier only, all historical events, all historical S-Tier only, Country ranks)
  • Difference/Change in ranking in the last 30 days to show how recent results have affected players. (recently added)
  • Player search to see all of their results in the recorded tournaments. (You need to make a copy of the sheet to use this)
  • Visual representation of top 20 players over time. Updated at the end of each month.

Ideas that are being thought about:
  • Adding a decay algorithm.
    • Instead of points being worth 100% all year round, then 0 after the year is up, they would decrease slowly, picking up speed as the year progresses, to better represent their current form.
  • Limited Rankings
    • Only include a limited number of results from A & B-Tiers to minimize players gaining lots of points in numerous smaller events vs weaker competition instead of performing against their peers.
    • The first attempt didn't have the desired effect and was almost identical to regular rankings, which may indicate that the idea isn't useful, or the implementation needs drastic improvement.
  • Increasing the prize split bonuses (and negative) and adding more breakpoints.
    • This is to make the largest tournaments even more impactful and reduce the impact of smaller events, possibly in combination with the above Limited Rankings.
    • Maybe something like $100k+ = 1.2, $75k+ = 1.0, $50k+ = 0.8, $25k+ = 0.6, $15k+ = 0.4, $5k+ = 0.2 $5k- = -0.1, $1k- = -0.4, $500- = -0.8
1653301590868.png

(MbL falls out of the top20 after not playing in a tournament for the last 5 months)​

1653301612357.png


1653303907186.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Angry
Reactions: marciocolombia, TheShaunPlays, Degaussed and 49 others
PROject_Belgium

BelgiumPROject_Belgium

Longswordman
Aug 31, 2014
903
2,998
108
24
Belgium
  • May 23, 2022
  • #2
Great job guys!
 
  • Love
Reactions: robo
Socksyy

AustraliaSocksyy

Champion
Nov 6, 2013
1,290
819
128
25
Australia
  • May 23, 2022
  • #3
Legends!
 
Adico

ArgentinaAdico

Longswordman
May 8, 2020
171
818
108
Buenos Aires
  • May 23, 2022
  • #4
If you want to implement decay, especially non-linear decay), here is the formula I use for the ATR:

Code:
points-(points*((TODAY()-Tournament end date)/365)^decay)

Points: is the flat amount of points that would be given out.
Tournament end date: is when the tournament is supposed to end, decay will start at that date.
Decay: is how strong you want the decay effect to be. for the ATR it's 1.8 resulting in this curve:
You have to flip it horizontally, but basically points start at 0

You can visualize different decays here https://www.desmos.com/calculator?lang=es

The full formula I have is:

Code:
=iferror(if(F2-(F2*((TODAY()-A2)/365)^1.8)<=0,"",F2-(F2*((TODAY()-A2)/365)^1.8)),F2)
 
  • Like
Reactions: vinigarcia87, IamJeo, Tarsiz and 4 others
Elvaenor

NetherlandsElvaenor

Two handed swordman
Sep 2, 2015
668
1,566
118
28
the Netherlands
  • May 23, 2022
  • #5
robo said:
  • Visual representation of top 20 players over time. Updated at the end of each month.
Click to expand...

The thing I didn't know I needed in life! Really satisfying to look at!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Feroker555, doacid and robo
L

GermanyLightysword

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
194
477
68
  • May 23, 2022
  • #6
Really nice. Did I see it correctly that S Tier Tournaments are the equivalent of Master Events, so winning them gives 1000 points?
I think it could be debated to give some tourneys Grand Slam status, in terms of revelance HiddenCup, NAC and KOTD come to mind there - and the Redbull Lan Event obviously. I think the distrinction in prestige and in part, pricepool would justify that.
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #7
Lightysword said:
Really nice. Did I see it correctly that S Tier Tournaments are the equivalent of Master Events, so winning them gives 1000 points?
I think it could be debated to give some tourneys Grand Slam status, in terms of revelance HiddenCup, NAC and KOTD come to mind there - and the Redbull Lan Event obviously. I think the distrinction in prestige and in part, pricepool would justify that.
Click to expand...
It's actually significantly more than that. The base point distribution is:
1653311617574.png


But every event has a modifier based on various criteria that increases or decreases the amount of points earned.

RBW5 for instance had a x2.0 modifier due to it's;
a) large prizepool +0.8
b) high number of participating players (inc qualifiers) +0.3
c) had a negative modifier due to some players being invited based on previous results -0.1
1.0+0.8+0.3-0.1 = x2.0 modifier.

You can read about the specific numbers and reasons why in the Details tab, and view what each tournament's modifier is in the Tourney Info tab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightysword and TheCapybara
Breakfast

United KingdomBreakfast

Well Known Pikeman
Dec 30, 2018
171
473
78
  • May 23, 2022
  • #8
This is fantastic stuff! Would it be possible to make Europe and America a little more distinct on the visual representation of the top 20 players for the colourblind among us?
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #9
Breakfast said:
This is fantastic stuff! Would it be possible to make Europe and America a little more distinct on the visual representation of the top 20 players for the colourblind among us?
Click to expand...
Updated, is this any better?
1653314216426.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: nimanoe and T-West
Breakfast

United KingdomBreakfast

Well Known Pikeman
Dec 30, 2018
171
473
78
  • May 23, 2022
  • #10
robo said:
Updated, is this any better?
View attachment 200742
Click to expand...
Much better, thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: robo
H

UnknownHappyLeaves

Halberdier
Jan 29, 2014
325
562
93
  • May 23, 2022
  • #11
Very good initiative.
 
Tiger__Moth

United KingdomTiger__Moth

Active Member
Feb 2, 2021
29
56
28
  • May 23, 2022
  • #12
Great work !
I like that you can sort by country..... 'oven ready' for a nation's cup
 
Musashi

JapanMusashi

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2018
95
337
68
Japan
  • May 23, 2022
  • #13
Looks amazing!
 
T

United StatesThe Bloodless

Halberdier
Jan 27, 2020
779
961
98
  • May 23, 2022
  • #14
I like this ranking because it puts me in the top 50.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: dave_hun, VivaSaghir, Degaussed and 6 others
U

UnknownUSC_kiky

Longswordman
May 24, 2011
1,352
685
113
  • May 23, 2022
  • #15
Great work!

To improve the visibility of this ranking system, I think it would be better if we could have an annual event designated for the top 4, 8, 16, 32 or 50 (just to include Bloodless ofc) players in this ranking :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Bloodless
Rustyiesty

United KingdomRustyiesty

Well Known Pikeman
Feb 28, 2019
190
301
78
32
Liverpool
  • May 24, 2022
  • #16
Idea for TG points - Last two years instead of last one year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: willdbeast
V

Unknownvblytmp

New Member
Jan 21, 2018
1
1
1
  • May 24, 2022
  • #17
Great work!

I'm curious about how things look if we use most recent n tournaments, instead of a fixed cut-off of 1-year. Motivation is to normalize for variation in frequency of tournaments over time (in tennis, there are a relatively stable number of grand slams, so using a time-based cutoff achieves the same thing).

Only include a limited number of results from A & B-Tiers to minimize players gaining lots of points in numerous smaller events vs weaker competition instead of performing against their peers.
Click to expand...

In addition, what I have in mind here is to use most recent n S-Tier tournaments, and most recent m A-tier tournaments etc at any time. This could help address the above issue in a more natural manner.

Adding a decay algorithm.
Click to expand...

+1. Most-recent can be combined with a decay as well, and think it might give better results.

Disclaimer: this might have been proposed earlier / stray thought, so might have other known issues :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: _srini_IVIaIVIa_
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #18
Rustyiesty said:
Idea for TG points - Last two years instead of last one year?
Click to expand...
I think there is still the issue of not being enough events, 2 years of TGs is 13 events, and 1 year of 1v1s is 31.
And there also aren't enough smaller events for other players to grind their way up and make a name for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shakal and Tarsiz
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #19
vblytmp said:
I'm curious about how things look if we use most recent n tournaments, instead of a fixed cut-off of 1-year. Motivation is to normalize for variation in frequency of tournaments over time (in tennis, there are a relatively stable number of grand slams, so using a time-based cutoff achieves the same thing).

In addition, what I have in mind here is to use most recent n S-Tier tournaments, and most recent m A-tier tournaments etc at any time. This could help address the above issue in a more natural manner.
Click to expand...

Seems like a reasonable idea
 
  • Like
Reactions: _srini_IVIaIVIa_ and vblytmp
U

UnknownUSC_kiky

Longswordman
May 24, 2011
1,352
685
113
  • May 24, 2022
  • #20
" the 'modifier' of the tournament which is impacted by the size of the prize pool, number of players, number of invited players, and other restrictions. "
Not sure if this has been mentioned/considered, but I feel that another factor that should not be ignored when determining the modifier is how many top players signed up for the events.

A $10k events that none of Viper, Lierey, Hera, Yo, Daut or Jordan signed up may not deserve a higher modifier than another $1k event that have all of these top players, though it's possible that there are more players signed up for the $10k event than the $1k event.

A metric that captures how competitive / prestigious a tournament is, in my mind, can be the average ATP ranking (as of right before the tournament) of the top 8 contestants that signed up for the tournament. Clearly, when all the 8 best players in the world signed up for the tournament, this metric is 4.5. But as of now, if the top 8 contestants that sign up for a new tournament are Vinchester (3), Dogao (12), Nico(13), Bact(14), Miguel(15), ClassicPro(17), Barles (18) and Slam (19), then this metric would be (3+12+13+14+15+17+18+19)/8 = 13.875. Obviously, the smaller this avg ATP ranking of top 8 contestants is, the more competitive this tournament would be.

This metric can adjust the modifier by accounting for scenarios when some top players, e.g. Viper, Hera, Lierey, Yo, can't take part in a tournament due to conflict of schedules or VISA issues. It's always easier to win a tournament when none of the top 8 players show up :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cinemaphile, jetseLinkinPark, robo and 3 others
nimanoe

Netherlandsnimanoe

Administrator
Staff member
Bronze Supporter
Jan 15, 2014
3,457
5,383
143
27
  • May 24, 2022
  • #21
Great work!
I think the ranking is fairly accurate, Liereyy and MbL are obviously rated too low, but that's because they haven't been active lately, not really a fault of the system.

I really like the suggestion from @USC_kiky above to look at how many top players played in the tournament. I think a small flaw of the current system is that it gives significantly more points to the top players in Visible Cup than the players who qualified for Hidden Cup, which is kind of weird. For example Nicov only got 160 points from Hidden Cup 4, but saymyname got 400 points for getting 3rd in Visible Cup 4 and 40 points for the Hidden Cup 4 qualifier.

If you don't go with the solution from Kiky, maybe you could have a negative multiplier for tournaments that have restricted who can sign up.
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,470
1
9,136
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #22
nimanoe said:
If you don't go with the solution from Kiky, maybe you could have a negative multiplier for tournaments that have restricted who can sign up.
Click to expand...
At the moment they already have the 'Other Restriction' negative modifier (-0.4), but it isn't enough to overcome the benefits of the events (high participants +0.3, no invites +0.1), but I didn't really consider the impact of the event alongside/compared to HC4 which is a valid point. Probably will add the elo -0.4 soonTM.

Maybe in addition to, or instead of @vblytmp suggestion, each tier of event could decay at different rates.
Eg. S-Tier events decay very slowly for the first 6 months (only losing 10-20% of their points), then increasing to maybe 50% by the end of the year, while A-Tier events decay 30-40% in the first 6 months, increasing to 100% at the end of the year, and B-Tier is even faster, and maybe they stop contributing before the year is even over to further limit their impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nimanoe
TheCapybara

United KingdomTheCapybara

Longswordman
Dec 1, 2018
226
1,104
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #23
I'd personally be vehemently against the idea of modifying value retroactively based on participants. It's one of the things I strongly dislike about Liquipedia's notability criteria. I think it's far preferable to judge a tournament on its settings rather than which players choose to play it, just like the French Open is still the French Open regardless of whether Djokovic and Nadal are fit to play it or not.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: The Bloodless, Crawsack, King_Boo and 2 others
willdbeast

United Kingdomwilldbeast

Longswordman
Nov 10, 2018
258
1,032
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #24
TheCapybara said:
I'd personally be vehemently against the idea of modifying value retroactively based on participants. It's one of the things I strongly dislike about Liquipedia's notability criteria. I think it's far preferable to judge a tournament on its settings rather than which players choose to play it, just like the French Open is still the French Open regardless of whether Djokovic and Nadal are fit to play it or not.
Click to expand...
Depends what exactly you are trying to measure
If you're measuring achievement then a win is a win
If you're measuring skill then the cohort of opponents you were against is surely relevant
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cinemaphile, _srini_IVIaIVIa_, JoshuaR and 1 other person
TheCapybara

United KingdomTheCapybara

Longswordman
Dec 1, 2018
226
1,104
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #25
willdbeast said:
Depends what exactly you are trying to measure
If you're measuring achievement then a win is a win
If you're measuring skill then the cohort of opponents you were against is surely relevant
Click to expand...
How would you start determining which opponents merit a positive impact on modifiers and which lower it? I know there's the suggestion from kiky above, but that then becomes self-deterministic (i.e. a higher ranked player enters an event and therefore makes that event worth more because of their own presence in it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crawsack, willdbeast and Michaerbse
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Remove ads? Become a premium member
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Time

Your time
G M T
Your zone

Calendar

Events
T90 vs Dave - Rigged Showmatch
Tuesday 01:00 (GMT +02:00)
Fundraiser for the Starlight Children's Foundation
@LilTrouble__
Showmatch: Mr Yo vs PROject Belgium ($200)
September 7th 19:00 (GMT +02:00)
King of Nomad Showmatch

AoE Live-Streams

There are in total 83 streamers online
Click here for details
Wintergaming
Age of Empires IV 628 viewers
Grubby
Age of Empires IV 373 viewers
黑大大
Age of Empires II 226 viewers
小瑜兒說你好
Age of Empires II 151 viewers
1_Puppypaw
Age of Empires IV 115 viewers
Tocaraca
Age of Empires II 99 viewers
SiG_Aramis
Age of Empires II 43 viewers
NorthernQuarter
Age of Empires IV 40 viewers
myqbox
Age of Empires II 38 viewers
Lord_Envidiates
Age of Empires II 35 viewers
Equilibrium_AOE
Age of Empires II 20 viewers
franketah
Age of Empires II 18 viewers
DrDabston
Age of Empires IV 18 viewers
Jimmy00123
Age of Empires II 16 viewers
ShellbeeTV
Age of Empires IV 15 viewers
eagleeyesmaloney
Age of Empires III 14 viewers
MikeJet22
Age of Empires II 13 viewers
estupidatoronja
Age of Empires II 12 viewers
aoerobot
Age of Empires 12 viewers
Dori_aoe_mx
Age of Empires III 11 viewers
SebaTero
Age of Empires II 10 viewers
jokersintelar
Age of Empires II 9 viewers
zerreira
Age of Empires II 9 viewers
Pastor_Geek
Age of Empires IV 9 viewers
dramosb96
Age of Empires III 8 viewers
maiumassella
Age of Empires II 7 viewers
1ron_chef
Age of Empires II 7 viewers
huseinmaco
Age of Empires II 6 viewers
沒用的邊緣廢物
Age of Empires II 6 viewers
pH_14_
Age of Empires II 6 viewers
UtinOwns
Age of Empires IV 6 viewers
radamanthys01x
Age of Empires III 6 viewers
bahaah
Age of Empires II 5 viewers
kw91078
Age of Empires II 5 viewers
twitch_xdrmario
Age of Empires 5 viewers
Bubb1eBees
Age of Empires III 5 viewers
Akita_AOE
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
FacciniPeek
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
SrFumi
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
Yavierus
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
AO_Bethor
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
almilux_
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
DarthAngel_
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
Socerton
Age of Empires IV 3 viewers
Fearing_7
Age of Empires III 3 viewers
sockerfreak101
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
ElNegro939
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
Nobu_AoE
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
Grinder_Fox
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
Dyukusi
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
HypoKrtz
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
snekeey
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
Ardeshiir
Age of Empires Online 2 viewers
i_graveytrain
Age of Empires III 2 viewers
eldmexicanox
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
JingleBellsGamingAoE
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
flatrimconspiracy
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
krmyth9
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
hilanderovsky
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
streamerkean
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
asikku
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
D0shu
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
pitilobeat
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
YO_YO_DUDE
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
FunKyeAoE
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
lorddamodarr
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
fatalskeptic
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
ERiQTENDO
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
stoneageknave
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
animrng
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
AoEGirl
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
Yoshmaista
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
benyu0205
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
PatDelMuerte
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
爆炒雞小萌
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
BigggMacccc91
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
salacious_gordon
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
BoneIsJustice
Age of Empires 1 viewers
pablito1998
Age of Empires III 1 viewers
alvar_a
Age of Empires III 1 viewers
quietgear_
Age of Empires III 1 viewers
godmother_the_good_witch
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
Cheetsus
Age of Empires IV 0 viewers

Voobly Top 5 RM 1v1

FaNTaZi___ 2404
Muhammed__ 2304
KillSwitch__ 2292
GeliyoruM__ 2217
MyHorseIsGay 2188

DE Top 5 RM 1v1

Click here for full list
[aM] Hera 2727
Villese 2653
_Barles_ 2614
[aM]_MbL40C_ 2607
[aM] Liereyy 2602

Voobly Top 5 RM Team Game

MyHorseIsGay 2190
Saeed_ 2023
RoR_Angelina 2016
Suxblime 2016
Nomad_BeThuy 2009

DE Top 5 RM Teamgame

Click here for full list
章士钊 2615
甜甜痛 2433
HGB_AOE 2291
永恒女王玛莉卡 2278
TheMax 2153

Voobly Top 5 DM 1v1

TheSheep_Raga 1999
Riker_ 1999
[GB_ ]_Churchill 1999
CSA_WR_Peck 1999
TheSheep_Knovo 1999

Voobly Top 5 DM Teamgame

Riker_ 2122
[FRoST]_8 2027
ImRamin_ 2016
TheGoat_ggwp 1996
TheGoat_Yati 1968

DE Top 5 Empire Wars 1v1

Click here for full list
[aM]_MbL40C_ 1960
ACCM |AOEbuilds.com 1933
mYi.Sitaux 1927
GL.slam 1923
Valas 1909

DE Top 5 Empire Wars TG

Click here for full list
Mr.Bean 1815
The_Dragonstar 1795
__BadBoy__ 1784
mYi.Sitaux 1752
[DAO] Motions 1715

Latest posts

  • S
    Current Situation on Aoe4 and Aoe2
    • Latest: Shakal
    • 21 minutes ago
    Age of Empires Franchise
  • felix.feroc
    August PUP
    • Latest: felix.feroc
    • 47 minutes ago
    General Discussion
  • D
    Should the mangonel delete bug come back?
    • Latest: Dkastro
    • Today at 5:28 AM
    General Discussion
  • Tocaraca
    AOE-II DE What do you think about Celts?
    • Latest: Tocaraca
    • Today at 12:52 AM
    General Discussion
  • Tocaraca
    AOE-II DE Suggestions for Burmese
    • Latest: Tocaraca
    • Today at 12:37 AM
    General Discussion

Share

Share this page
Share
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • AoEZone Dark theme
  • English (US)
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2022 XenForo Ltd. | Style by ThemeHouse
XenPorta 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
XenAtendo 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
Top
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…