AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Help
  • What's new
    New posts New profile posts Latest activity Help
  • Calendar
    Monthly Weekly Agenda Archive Help
  • Groups
    Public Events
  • AoEZone
    Menu Home A Guide for Beginners AoE On Twitch AoE On YouTube AoE2 Hall of Fame Feedback and Suggestions Support AoEZone Help
    Shortcuts General Discussion Community Café Questions and Answers Chat and Chit-chat Articles and Guides Resources and Downloads Live Streaming and Videos Foro Publico (Español) Fórum Público (Brasil) Age Of Empires Clans AoE II DE Leaderboards MS Zone Rating History
    Tournaments Battle of Africa 3 Red Bull Wololo: Legacy RMS Cup 2 T90 Titans League Terra Nova Duos Wallhalla General Tournament Discussion Current Tournaments Recurring Series Past Tournaments
    Recorded Games Search for Games Daily Games Expert Games Deathmatch Custom Scenario Classic Games Map Database
Log in
Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
  • Latest activity
  • Help
  • Register

Search

Search recorded games
By:
Advanced search…
Search recorded games
By:
Advanced…
AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community AoEZone - The international Age Of Empires community
Menu
Install the app
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Menu

Home
A Guide for Beginners
AoE On Twitch
AoE On YouTube
AoE2 Hall of Fame
Feedback and Suggestions
Support AoEZone
Help

Shortcuts

General Discussion
Community Café
Questions and Answers
Chat and Chit-chat
Articles and Guides
Resources and Downloads
Live Streaming and Videos
Foro Publico (Español)
Fórum Público (Brasil)
Age Of Empires Clans
AoE II DE Leaderboards
MS Zone Rating History

Tournaments

Battle of Africa 3
Red Bull Wololo: Legacy
RMS Cup 2
T90 Titans League
Terra Nova Duos
Wallhalla
General Tournament Discussion
Current Tournaments
Recurring Series
Past Tournaments

Recorded Games

Search for Games
Daily Games
Expert Games
Deathmatch
Custom Scenario
Classic Games
Map Database

Members online

  • UnknownTheDragonReborn
  • GermanyBourne2Die
  • NetherlandsElvaenor
  • Japanmonimoni
  • NorwayKellar
  • JordanMAE_ME
  • Mexicomalamadre
  • SpainGauss
  • NetherlandsJaimeAOC
  • GermanyHotte343
  • Canadajballa95
  • NorwaySnippy
  • CanadaTheNorthernHoser
  • United Statesvince
  • SlovakiaIvIaximus
  • Unknown_vivi
  • GermanyTendo
  • SloveniaSigismund
  • AustraliaSocksyy
Total: 75 (members: 23, guests: 52)

Today's birthdays

  • A
  • AntGrabber
  • M
  • Moracrema
  • zaid
  • General Tournament Discussion

AoE2 Tournament Points

  • Thread starter Australiarobo
  • Start date May 23, 2022
  • Tags
    atp tournament ranking
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Remove ads? Become a premium member......
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #1
First seen here and here and analyzed here, I'd like to present a finalized version of the ATP (AoE2 Tournament Points) rankings, which are based on the ATP system used in professional Tennis and modified to try to suit Age of Empires 2.

Before I begin, huge thanks to @Tarsiz for initially creating the spreadsheet and kickstarting the idea, @Degaussed , @TheCapybara , @King_Boo , and the rest of the GB Discord for providing feedback and suggestions as new features were implemented, and @Adico for allowing me to shamelessly steal borrow ideas from the AoE IV ATR sheet.

  • 1v1 ATP Sheet
  • TG ATP Sheet (Note this is still WiP and some features from the 1v1 sheet have not been carried over yet)

Simply put, the ATP rankings are intended to be a way to track player tournament performance and provide an alternate method for seeding them in tournaments as accurately as possible, taking into account a wide range of criteria.
Players earn points based on the end position in a tournament (more points for first, less for 33-64th) weighted by the 'modifier' of the tournament which is impacted by the size of the prize pool, number of players, number of invited players, and other restrictions.
Currently, players do not earn any points if they do not complete all of their matches, that is, they withdraw or are otherwise disqualified from an event regardless of where they actually ended up, and any matches/games that were played are not counted towards their win/loss results.

The Team game sheet has a small delay in adding features compared to the 1v1 Rankings, as I want to make sure any changes are functional and completed before spending the time duplicating them onto another sheet. There is also significantly less data (54 completed 1v1 tournaments vs 14 completed tgs) so any inference from the rankings is dubious at best. I mostly created it to see what the numbers would look like. Players only earn points if they actually participate and play in games, being on the roster is not enough.

If anyone has any feedback, ideas or suggestions please do share them.

Features include:
  • Almost all S, A, & B-Tier 1v1 tournaments since the release of DE are included. Over 200 players & 1300 tournament results included and counting!
  • Tournaments are only counted for 1 year to represent their current form, but older data is still available.
  • Match and Game win rate for most events within that time period. (some qualifiers are yet to be included)
  • Various versions of the rankings (Regular, S-Tier only, all historical events, all historical S-Tier only, Country ranks)
  • Difference/Change in ranking in the last 30 days to show how recent results have affected players. (recently added)
  • Player search to see all of their results in the recorded tournaments. (You need to make a copy of the sheet to use this)
  • Visual representation of top 20 players over time. Updated at the end of each month.

Ideas that are being thought about:
  • Adding a decay algorithm.
    • Instead of points being worth 100% all year round, then 0 after the year is up, they would decrease slowly, picking up speed as the year progresses, to better represent their current form.
  • Limited Rankings
    • Only include a limited number of results from A & B-Tiers to minimize players gaining lots of points in numerous smaller events vs weaker competition instead of performing against their peers.
    • The first attempt didn't have the desired effect and was almost identical to regular rankings, which may indicate that the idea isn't useful, or the implementation needs drastic improvement.
  • Increasing the prize split bonuses (and negative) and adding more breakpoints.
    • This is to make the largest tournaments even more impactful and reduce the impact of smaller events, possibly in combination with the above Limited Rankings.
    • Maybe something like $100k+ = 1.2, $75k+ = 1.0, $50k+ = 0.8, $25k+ = 0.6, $15k+ = 0.4, $5k+ = 0.2 $5k- = -0.1, $1k- = -0.4, $500- = -0.8
1653301590868.png

(MbL falls out of the top20 after not playing in a tournament for the last 5 months)​

1653301612357.png


1653303907186.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Angry
Reactions: marciocolombia, TheShaunPlays, Degaussed and 49 others
PROject_Belgium

BelgiumPROject_Belgium

Longswordman
Aug 31, 2014
903
2,995
108
24
Belgium
Voobly
PROject_Belgium
View profile
Ladder
RM - 1v1
Rating
2000
Wins
2497
Losses
1995
Streak
-7
  • May 23, 2022
  • #2
Great job guys!
 
  • Love
Reactions: robo
Socksyy

AustraliaSocksyy

Champion
Nov 6, 2013
1,287
816
128
25
Australia
Voobly
Socksyy
View profile
Ladder
RM - 1v1
Rating
2000
Wins
738
Losses
898
Streak
3
  • May 23, 2022
  • #3
Legends!
 
Adico

ArgentinaAdico

Longswordman
May 8, 2020
171
818
108
Buenos Aires
  • May 23, 2022
  • #4
If you want to implement decay, especially non-linear decay), here is the formula I use for the ATR:

Code:
points-(points*((TODAY()-Tournament end date)/365)^decay)

Points: is the flat amount of points that would be given out.
Tournament end date: is when the tournament is supposed to end, decay will start at that date.
Decay: is how strong you want the decay effect to be. for the ATR it's 1.8 resulting in this curve:
You have to flip it horizontally, but basically points start at 0

You can visualize different decays here https://www.desmos.com/calculator?lang=es

The full formula I have is:

Code:
=iferror(if(F2-(F2*((TODAY()-A2)/365)^1.8)<=0,"",F2-(F2*((TODAY()-A2)/365)^1.8)),F2)
 
  • Like
Reactions: vinigarcia87, IamJeo, Tarsiz and 4 others
Elvaenor

NetherlandsElvaenor

Two handed swordman
Sep 2, 2015
668
1,566
118
28
the Netherlands
  • May 23, 2022
  • #5
robo said:
  • Visual representation of top 20 players over time. Updated at the end of each month.
Click to expand...

The thing I didn't know I needed in life! Really satisfying to look at!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Feroker555, doacid and robo
L

GermanyLightysword

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
190
460
68
  • May 23, 2022
  • #6
Really nice. Did I see it correctly that S Tier Tournaments are the equivalent of Master Events, so winning them gives 1000 points?
I think it could be debated to give some tourneys Grand Slam status, in terms of revelance HiddenCup, NAC and KOTD come to mind there - and the Redbull Lan Event obviously. I think the distrinction in prestige and in part, pricepool would justify that.
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #7
Lightysword said:
Really nice. Did I see it correctly that S Tier Tournaments are the equivalent of Master Events, so winning them gives 1000 points?
I think it could be debated to give some tourneys Grand Slam status, in terms of revelance HiddenCup, NAC and KOTD come to mind there - and the Redbull Lan Event obviously. I think the distrinction in prestige and in part, pricepool would justify that.
Click to expand...
It's actually significantly more than that. The base point distribution is:
1653311617574.png


But every event has a modifier based on various criteria that increases or decreases the amount of points earned.

RBW5 for instance had a x2.0 modifier due to it's;
a) large prizepool +0.8
b) high number of participating players (inc qualifiers) +0.3
c) had a negative modifier due to some players being invited based on previous results -0.1
1.0+0.8+0.3-0.1 = x2.0 modifier.

You can read about the specific numbers and reasons why in the Details tab, and view what each tournament's modifier is in the Tourney Info tab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lightysword and TheCapybara
Breakfast

United KingdomBreakfast

Well Known Pikeman
Dec 30, 2018
171
473
78
  • May 23, 2022
  • #8
This is fantastic stuff! Would it be possible to make Europe and America a little more distinct on the visual representation of the top 20 players for the colourblind among us?
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 23, 2022
  • #9
Breakfast said:
This is fantastic stuff! Would it be possible to make Europe and America a little more distinct on the visual representation of the top 20 players for the colourblind among us?
Click to expand...
Updated, is this any better?
1653314216426.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: nimanoe and T-West
Breakfast

United KingdomBreakfast

Well Known Pikeman
Dec 30, 2018
171
473
78
  • May 23, 2022
  • #10
robo said:
Updated, is this any better?
View attachment 200742
Click to expand...
Much better, thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: robo
H

UnknownHappyLeaves

Halberdier
Jan 29, 2014
325
562
93
  • May 23, 2022
  • #11
Very good initiative.
 
Tiger__Moth

United KingdomTiger__Moth

Active Member
Feb 2, 2021
29
56
28
  • May 23, 2022
  • #12
Great work !
I like that you can sort by country..... 'oven ready' for a nation's cup
 
Musashi

JapanMusashi

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2018
94
336
68
Japan
  • May 23, 2022
  • #13
Looks amazing!
 
T

United StatesThe Bloodless

Halberdier
Jan 27, 2020
779
961
98
  • May 23, 2022
  • #14
I like this ranking because it puts me in the top 50.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: dave_hun, VivaSaghir, Degaussed and 6 others
U

UnknownUSC_kiky

Longswordman
May 24, 2011
1,351
683
113
  • May 23, 2022
  • #15
Great work!

To improve the visibility of this ranking system, I think it would be better if we could have an annual event designated for the top 4, 8, 16, 32 or 50 (just to include Bloodless ofc) players in this ranking :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Bloodless
Rustyiesty

United KingdomRustyiesty

Well Known Pikeman
Feb 28, 2019
190
301
78
32
Liverpool
  • May 24, 2022
  • #16
Idea for TG points - Last two years instead of last one year?
 
  • Like
Reactions: willdbeast
V

Unknownvblytmp

New Member
Jan 21, 2018
1
1
1
  • May 24, 2022
  • #17
Great work!

I'm curious about how things look if we use most recent n tournaments, instead of a fixed cut-off of 1-year. Motivation is to normalize for variation in frequency of tournaments over time (in tennis, there are a relatively stable number of grand slams, so using a time-based cutoff achieves the same thing).

Only include a limited number of results from A & B-Tiers to minimize players gaining lots of points in numerous smaller events vs weaker competition instead of performing against their peers.
Click to expand...

In addition, what I have in mind here is to use most recent n S-Tier tournaments, and most recent m A-tier tournaments etc at any time. This could help address the above issue in a more natural manner.

Adding a decay algorithm.
Click to expand...

+1. Most-recent can be combined with a decay as well, and think it might give better results.

Disclaimer: this might have been proposed earlier / stray thought, so might have other known issues :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: _srini_IVIaIVIa_
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #18
Rustyiesty said:
Idea for TG points - Last two years instead of last one year?
Click to expand...
I think there is still the issue of not being enough events, 2 years of TGs is 13 events, and 1 year of 1v1s is 31.
And there also aren't enough smaller events for other players to grind their way up and make a name for themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shakal and Tarsiz
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #19
vblytmp said:
I'm curious about how things look if we use most recent n tournaments, instead of a fixed cut-off of 1-year. Motivation is to normalize for variation in frequency of tournaments over time (in tennis, there are a relatively stable number of grand slams, so using a time-based cutoff achieves the same thing).

In addition, what I have in mind here is to use most recent n S-Tier tournaments, and most recent m A-tier tournaments etc at any time. This could help address the above issue in a more natural manner.
Click to expand...

Seems like a reasonable idea
 
  • Like
Reactions: _srini_IVIaIVIa_ and vblytmp
U

UnknownUSC_kiky

Longswordman
May 24, 2011
1,351
683
113
  • May 24, 2022
  • #20
" the 'modifier' of the tournament which is impacted by the size of the prize pool, number of players, number of invited players, and other restrictions. "
Not sure if this has been mentioned/considered, but I feel that another factor that should not be ignored when determining the modifier is how many top players signed up for the events.

A $10k events that none of Viper, Lierey, Hera, Yo, Daut or Jordan signed up may not deserve a higher modifier than another $1k event that have all of these top players, though it's possible that there are more players signed up for the $10k event than the $1k event.

A metric that captures how competitive / prestigious a tournament is, in my mind, can be the average ATP ranking (as of right before the tournament) of the top 8 contestants that signed up for the tournament. Clearly, when all the 8 best players in the world signed up for the tournament, this metric is 4.5. But as of now, if the top 8 contestants that sign up for a new tournament are Vinchester (3), Dogao (12), Nico(13), Bact(14), Miguel(15), ClassicPro(17), Barles (18) and Slam (19), then this metric would be (3+12+13+14+15+17+18+19)/8 = 13.875. Obviously, the smaller this avg ATP ranking of top 8 contestants is, the more competitive this tournament would be.

This metric can adjust the modifier by accounting for scenarios when some top players, e.g. Viper, Hera, Lierey, Yo, can't take part in a tournament due to conflict of schedules or VISA issues. It's always easier to win a tournament when none of the top 8 players show up :smile:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cinemaphile, jetseLinkinPark, robo and 3 others
nimanoe

Netherlandsnimanoe

Administrator
Staff member
Bronze Supporter
Jan 15, 2014
3,448
5,375
143
27
  • May 24, 2022
  • #21
Great work!
I think the ranking is fairly accurate, Liereyy and MbL are obviously rated too low, but that's because they haven't been active lately, not really a fault of the system.

I really like the suggestion from @USC_kiky above to look at how many top players played in the tournament. I think a small flaw of the current system is that it gives significantly more points to the top players in Visible Cup than the players who qualified for Hidden Cup, which is kind of weird. For example Nicov only got 160 points from Hidden Cup 4, but saymyname got 400 points for getting 3rd in Visible Cup 4 and 40 points for the Hidden Cup 4 qualifier.

If you don't go with the solution from Kiky, maybe you could have a negative multiplier for tournaments that have restricted who can sign up.
 
robo

Australiarobo

Administrator
Dec 12, 2011
8,464
1
9,125
153
Australia
twitter.com
  • May 24, 2022
  • #22
nimanoe said:
If you don't go with the solution from Kiky, maybe you could have a negative multiplier for tournaments that have restricted who can sign up.
Click to expand...
At the moment they already have the 'Other Restriction' negative modifier (-0.4), but it isn't enough to overcome the benefits of the events (high participants +0.3, no invites +0.1), but I didn't really consider the impact of the event alongside/compared to HC4 which is a valid point. Probably will add the elo -0.4 soonTM.

Maybe in addition to, or instead of @vblytmp suggestion, each tier of event could decay at different rates.
Eg. S-Tier events decay very slowly for the first 6 months (only losing 10-20% of their points), then increasing to maybe 50% by the end of the year, while A-Tier events decay 30-40% in the first 6 months, increasing to 100% at the end of the year, and B-Tier is even faster, and maybe they stop contributing before the year is even over to further limit their impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nimanoe
TheCapybara

United KingdomTheCapybara

Longswordman
Dec 1, 2018
226
1,104
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #23
I'd personally be vehemently against the idea of modifying value retroactively based on participants. It's one of the things I strongly dislike about Liquipedia's notability criteria. I think it's far preferable to judge a tournament on its settings rather than which players choose to play it, just like the French Open is still the French Open regardless of whether Djokovic and Nadal are fit to play it or not.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: The Bloodless, Crawsack, King_Boo and 2 others
willdbeast

United Kingdomwilldbeast

Longswordman
Nov 10, 2018
256
1,030
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #24
TheCapybara said:
I'd personally be vehemently against the idea of modifying value retroactively based on participants. It's one of the things I strongly dislike about Liquipedia's notability criteria. I think it's far preferable to judge a tournament on its settings rather than which players choose to play it, just like the French Open is still the French Open regardless of whether Djokovic and Nadal are fit to play it or not.
Click to expand...
Depends what exactly you are trying to measure
If you're measuring achievement then a win is a win
If you're measuring skill then the cohort of opponents you were against is surely relevant
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cinemaphile, _srini_IVIaIVIa_, JoshuaR and 1 other person
TheCapybara

United KingdomTheCapybara

Longswordman
Dec 1, 2018
226
1,104
108
  • May 24, 2022
  • #25
willdbeast said:
Depends what exactly you are trying to measure
If you're measuring achievement then a win is a win
If you're measuring skill then the cohort of opponents you were against is surely relevant
Click to expand...
How would you start determining which opponents merit a positive impact on modifiers and which lower it? I know there's the suggestion from kiky above, but that then becomes self-deterministic (i.e. a higher ranked player enters an event and therefore makes that event worth more because of their own presence in it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crawsack, willdbeast and Michaerbse
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Remove ads? Become a premium member
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Time

Your time
G M T
Your zone

Calendar

Featured Events
GRAND FINAL | Nomad Warriors | ACCM vs PROject Belgium
Wednesday 17:00 (GMT +02:00)
Grand Final BO7 of Nomad Warriors
T90 Titans League Gold Playoffs
Thursday 16:00 (GMT +02:00)
Round of 12
@T90Official
T90 Titans League Gold Playoffs
Saturday 15:00 (GMT +02:00)
Quarterfinals
@T90Official
T90 Titans League Gold Playoffs
Sunday 15:00 (GMT +02:00)
Semis & Grand Final
@T90Official
Events
Arena Show-Match
Wednesday 18:00 (GMT +02:00)
Amigos vs CL
TheViper vs Vinchester - Rigged Showmatch
Saturday 10:00 (GMT +02:00)
Fundraiser for the Starlight Children's Foundation
@LilTrouble__

AoE Live-Streams

There are in total 122 streamers online
Click here for details
Hera
Age of Empires II 1127 viewers
TaToHAoE
Age of Empires II 972 viewers
JorDan_AoE
Age of Empires II 645 viewers
KillerPigeon
Age of Empires IV 249 viewers
小恐龍吼吼吼
Age of Empires II 199 viewers
Pinch3Terneira
Age of Empires II 146 viewers
Trenlass
Age of Empires IV 119 viewers
黑大大
Age of Empires II 114 viewers
歐小雨
Age of Empires II 108 viewers
Monoz_aoe
Age of Empires II 97 viewers
iamturk
Age of Empires III 90 viewers
長毛
Age of Empires IV 86 viewers
Szalamii11
Age of Empires IV 76 viewers
IAmMissElephant
Age of Empires II 59 viewers
Paganini_AoE2
Age of Empires II 56 viewers
NOTAKONjp
Age of Empires IV 47 viewers
YiGaaaa
Age of Empires IV 38 viewers
wai_tata
Age of Empires II 25 viewers
Adne_AoE
Age of Empires IV 25 viewers
saymyname2909
Age of Empires 25 viewers
星月ほしつき
Age of Empires IV 19 viewers
shotelcalifornia
Age of Empires II 18 viewers
Grunthor
Age of Empires II 17 viewers
熙風
Age of Empires IV 15 viewers
Loxtaaz_
Age of Empires II 13 viewers
DrKozmonot
Age of Empires II 12 viewers
Sagittarian_TV
Age of Empires IV 12 viewers
三隻小花貓
Age of Empires II 11 viewers
1voicau3danAoE
Age of Empires 11 viewers
lolakujo
Age of Empires II 9 viewers
路人君
Age of Empires IV 9 viewers
정예튜턴족기사
Age of Empires III 9 viewers
啊魚
Age of Empires IV 8 viewers
內湖喬瑟夫高登李維
Age of Empires IV 8 viewers
Juicy45
Age of Empires II 7 viewers
joker_aoe
Age of Empires IV 7 viewers
八代桃華
Age of Empires IV 7 viewers
theREALhandi
Age of Empires II 6 viewers
Taykhan
Age of Empires IV 6 viewers
大雨狐
Age of Empires IV 6 viewers
Dhemyx
Age of Empires II 5 viewers
RAFACARRY
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
依布
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
依亞
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
青苔莫斯
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
hit0rigs
Age of Empires IV 5 viewers
AlphaNJTWCH
Age of Empires II 4 viewers
krauss966
Age of Empires IV 4 viewers
MediaPlay
Age of Empires IV 4 viewers
NEETshioya
Age of Empires IV 4 viewers
IIIIIIIIIIPelao
Age of Empires III 4 viewers
Rivayv
Age of Empires III 4 viewers
慕凡
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
comy993
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
만년킹
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
LikaStyleJP
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
give_me_happy
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
Buzzer0125
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
AgeEinz
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
咪咪29
Age of Empires II 3 viewers
종이형
Age of Empires IV 3 viewers
庭庭很累
Age of Empires IV 3 viewers
傑克玉米
Age of Empires IV 3 viewers
世界さま
Age of Empires IV 3 viewers
AlvaroGR
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
TheRealPeteKirkwood
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
gekro123
Age of Empires II 2 viewers
MediMash
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
一朵雲雲雲
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
Munchz7878
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
無骨貓
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
天陽_朔夜
Age of Empires IV 2 viewers
daiz565
Age of Empires 2 viewers
憤怒企鵝
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
oyecomovaaoe
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
coganta_righ
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
喵仔
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
MinhAnhAoe2de
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
Redneckturtle5
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
streamerkean
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
red2bxl
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
masa4_
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
gdr_20
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
小小鮭魚
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
FunKyeAoE
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
evildragonstars
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
torrent5
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
Dranzer13
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
二歌
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
godmother_the_good_witch
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
Torrelles
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
AL7HA
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
RealMara
Age of Empires II 1 viewers
司馬仲子
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
Robbsntv
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
小紫倉鼠天然呆
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
楷楷唷
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
小波尼好
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
FireD_Jaune
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
天羽洢
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
DauHui
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
厭世包哥
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
派大星捲毛
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
維培不是培維
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
狼端冰皇
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
易96
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
鍾雪深
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
太陽哈子
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
嵐之語意
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
培堀利阿
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
LittleRice
Age of Empires IV 1 viewers
tikibouzu
Age of Empires 1 viewers
goz31116
Age of Empires 1 viewers
tuta_chan
Age of Empires 1 viewers
obs54
Age of Empires 1 viewers
panna_55
Age of Empires 1 viewers
Okjokull
Age of Empires 1 viewers
MatM1996
Age of Empires Online 1 viewers
187197
Age of Empires III 1 viewers
toboalpha
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
headsketch
Age of Empires II 0 viewers
wariohomer
Age of Empires II 0 viewers

Voobly Top 5 RM 1v1

FaNTaZi___ 2429
Muhammed__ 2329
KillSwitch__ 2317
GeliyoruM__ 2242
Daddy 2186

DE Top 5 RM 1v1

Click here for full list
[aM] Hera 2727
[aM] Liereyy 2659
Villese 2653
_Barles_ 2614
SalzZ_Vinchester 2609

Voobly Top 5 RM Team Game

Daddy 2176
Saeed_ 2033
RoR_Angelina 2021
Muhammed__ 2019
Cyrus__empire 2016

DE Top 5 RM Teamgame

Click here for full list
章士钊 2615
HGB_AOE 2332
永恒女王玛莉卡 2318
正义的威震天 2141
TheMax 2110

Voobly Top 5 DM 1v1

xMp_sShake 2005
SLow_Down_BaBy 2003
TheSheep_Raga 1999
Riker_ 1999
[GB_ ]_Churchill 1999

Voobly Top 5 DM Teamgame

Riker_ 2132
[FRoST]_8 2027
ImRamin_ 2026
TheGoat_ggwp 2006
MorTaL_SieGe_ 1975

DE Top 5 Empire Wars 1v1

Click here for full list
[aM] Nicov 1905
SalzZ_classicpro 1885
SalzZ_Vinchester 1876
GL.TheViper 1861
[aM]_MbL40C_ 1860

DE Top 5 Empire Wars TG

Click here for full list
Mr.Bean 1831
The_Dragonstar 1810
mYi.Sitaux 1765
ElNoniro 1712
[DAO] Motions 1711

Latest posts

  • Kellar
    AOE-II DE Do you think Shirvamsha rider should keep their dodge against melee projectiles or even gunpowder too?!
    • Latest: Kellar
    • 1 minute ago
    General Discussion
  • N
    AOE-II DE The smurf problem in DE
    • Latest: Nicov
    • 35 minutes ago
    Random Map
  • Huehuecoyotl22
    Looking For Custom Maps For New Age2 DE Tournament
    • Latest: Huehuecoyotl22
    • Today at 3:23 PM
    Random Map
  • PROject_Belgium
    [Aug 10, 2022] GRAND FINAL | Nomad Warriors | ACCM vs PROject Belgium (Grand Final BO7 of Nomad Warriors)
    • Latest: PROject_Belgium
    • Today at 10:23 AM
    Event Calendar
  • S
    I would be happy if kipchaks would be buffed.
    • Latest: sleachim
    • Today at 9:52 AM
    General Discussion

Share

Share this page
Share
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • AoEZone Dark theme
  • English (US)
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2022 XenForo Ltd. | Style by ThemeHouse
XenPorta 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
XenAtendo 2 PRO © Jason Axelrod of 8WAYRUN
Top
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…