The team game scene needs the top teams playing there to reduce the elo inflation, but some how the top players don't play tgs together in DE and if they do they play it unranked.
Before DE they were usually playing the Tg +1800 games in voobly and i am talking about Suomi, chinese boys, Am and even secret guys, but those team games are gone, why aren't they playing? don't they like the DE for team games? I read from zuppi his thoughts and he was quite disappointing with the DE, but all his team thinks the same? the am boys? the rest?
I will add it with the next update.@Huehuecoyotl22
Maybe next to the other names column (or instead of it), could you link their steam profile instead?
That account has now disappeared from the ladder, right? If you don't mind, when I add the Steam profile links to the list, could you provide the link to that one?You're right. The 1901 just got -20 and 1796 got -14. Both after exactly 14 days of inactivity.
Yes, look at the amount of "unranked" games of the top players:They have a group chat and organise unranked tgs.
I'm not sure of the exact reasons but I would assume it's because they know that they will get evenly matched games and can pick which maps to play.
Looks very good. I knew it was possible already to do it like this although I did not yet look into how.Hi @Huehuecoyotl22 ,
I made a google sheet to automatically update the highest ratings for all accounts that have been identified as 2k+.
It currently updates every night* and also shows the currently used nicknames. The only thing that has to be done is to add the player name, country and steam ID to the data sheet, when an account reaches 2k. (I will try to automate the scanning for new accounts as well - should be possible but will take some time)Highest DE Rates RM 1v1
Leaderboard Rank,Player,Country (pre),Country,Flag,Highest DE Rating,Number of Games,Current Account Names,aoe2.net Profiles,<a href="https://aoe-elo.com/">Tournament Elo</a>,<a href="https://www.aoezone.net/threads/list-of-highest-rm-1v1-rating-reached.138320/">Highest Voobly Rating</a>,Other K...docs.google.com
Initially, I only considered accounts that reach 2k instead of 1k9 cause I think it's a "prettier" threshold and I guess there will be more players reaching it mid-term anyway...
Hope the sheet simplifies updating the table.
*It is supposed to only update every night but right now it looks like it sometimes updates when I reload the file as well. @aoe2net Let me know if this causes any issues with regard to API calls.
As for voobly 1v1 rating, I assume you mean adding them manually? Haven't checked any voobly API and I guess putting in effort to automate it would not make any sense right now...Looks very good. I knew it was possible already to do it like this although I did not yet look into how.
What do you think about adding the Voobly 1v1 rating and the game amount to your list too?
Will think about it but adding them 1 by 1 when they hit 2k is also not too much effort1.9k was reasonable first, since there were only 3 2k+ accounts when I started, if I remember correctly. But in the end all of the people who were 1.9k should reach 2k at any point anyway. So if automatic addition is too difficult, you could just add them already, then some time is saved for later.
I was just hiding the column with the country, it's back in now (not in brackets but I guess it's still easier that way)I can almost copy your table now, just the flags are not ideal. They look prettier the way you do it, but for AoEZone it's better to just write the country name in brackets and then they will appear here. Maybe you can have both in your table.
Yep, my plan was to add that to the first column but I guess it'll get too messy so I'll probably add that later.Further, I would personally always keep other well-known akas, even if the players did not use them on DE so far. Because if you search for performances (tournaments, lists, recs) from the past, you then can find out who is who more easily. The best example for that would be Yellow and vivi. LaaaaaN also played in NAC 3 as Antagonist, so that should be added too.
Yes, manually. For almost all of them it shouldn't change anymore.As for voobly 1v1 rating, I assume you mean adding them manually? Haven't checked any voobly API and I guess putting in effort to automate it would not make any sense right now...
Regarding game amount: What exactly do you mean? Number of games on the highest rated account or sum of games across all known accounts (above 2k)
Have addedYes, manually. For almost all of them it shouldn't change anymore.
Games played either for the player or the highest rated account. Maybe less important now and later, but first it was interesting, because you could see e. g. TheViper or TheMax did play much less games than vivi or Hera, that's why they were lower rated. Not because they played worse.
Yes, actually his first one.So who was Terror's Disciple? Another Modri account?
Tbh I'm not too excited about the TG and DM ladder, doesn't feel too competitive right now. But yeah, wouldn't take too much time I guess. I will look into it, not sure whether I'll make it before next weekend though...Yes, actually his first one.
Now that you almost have replaced all my work - making the same for TG and Death Match shouldn't be difficult.
For TG we could start at 2.3 k limit now.
We could work together on finding the akas and possibly Voobly ratings.
Yes, I also think they, especially DM, will matter more once there will be tournaments.Tbh I'm not too excited about the TG and DM ladder, doesn't feel too competitive right now. But yeah, wouldn't take too much time I guess. I will look into it, not sure whether I'll make it before next weekend though...
I will add it with the next update.
That account has now disappeared from the ladder, right? If you don't mind, when I add the Steam profile links to the list, could you provide the link to that one?
Yes, look at the amount of "unranked" games of the top players:
Nicov: 207, TheViper: 186, dogao: 141, Mr Yo: 315, TheMax: 250, Villese: 258, Rubenstock: 171, Tim: 338, GKT_cloud: 247, Paladin: 251 ...
I assume that most of them are team games.
So you can gain "unranked" rating playing against the AI? Or does it just count the game number but give no points. I can't imagine the top players having many of those games.Plus, I know these players use MP unranked to play against the AI instead of using the SP menu, wonder why
While Tim still is a better 1v1 player, it is hard to measure how far away Tim and Ganji are as TG players. I would argue that it's not several 100 points and Tim reached #1 with the same methods as Ganji, not because anyone played better the last weeks.first pro player that actually tryhards TG ladder gets #1.. hope more will follow
View attachment 175934
Most of the super inflated guys in the top 30 are there because of the time zone difference, ganji and tim can theoretically reach 2.6k without facing each other, there a lot of guys there with enough elo to farm points.they have to play vs each other 2v2. stop noob bashing and go for the real deal
there are not enough players to reach 3kMost of the super inflated guys in the top 30 are there because of the time zone difference, ganji and tim can theoretically reach 2.6k without facing each other, there a lot of guys there with enough elo to farm points.
The DE tg ladder could be the first ladder reaching 3k elo players at this rate within the next 4 months, they really need to penalize stackers and change the formula to give less points to prevent that future.
Our heroes are n1 and n4 on the ladder, what you talking about?I love how u guys think me, ganji and others 2k+ just loove to noob bash and stack instead the Great unbeatable Tim isnt playing the same teams we are playing and stacking with his Friends just as much, u guys cant really stand the fact that ur heroes are Not on top of the ladder