I'm really not a fan of mirror matches as it reduces the strategic possibilites.
On the other hand, I think is clear that we as viewers like fast civ drafts.
I have thought of some kind of compromise to deal with civ selection.
Let's imagine a Bo5 situation.
For each map in the tournament...
I don't get why cumans got all the good bonuses and Tatars all the crappy ones. Why not give the extra speed to Tatars and actually make them somewhat good? They are after all also a steppe civ.
If anyone gets an error message like this one, be sure to deactivate your onboard video card and use the dedicated GPU to run the game. Took me a while but I got it running doing that.
My idea is the following, explained for a Bo5 series (but easy to generalize).
- Let's suppose we have an ordered list of civs, from 1 to 35, with 35 being the top civ. This list can be put together using game statistics plus some input from organizers and players.
Remark: instead of one single...
I feel like voobly is a better community building platform, where everyone gathers in the same "forum" and sees other people, there is a general chat, you see all available games, etc.
The DE lobby just gives you a match but you have no idea what's going on in general.
Hi, I'm new. I like MBL's attitude. Everyone is so nice and repectful in tournaments that it becomes a bit boring. 'Villains' are fun in all competitions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.