This reveals that the problem with the previous system was the system abuse by some through smurfs accounts, not the system itself.
For example, if a 2k player plays with one 1k, against two 1k5s, the game should be equal and he deserves points for winning that game. The problem is when that 1k...
Hello! Your comment is interesting.
Taking your example into account, in the Team A the player 1800 would get like 10 points, since it's like he won a 1v1 against a 1600 player. The problem is: if he wins the same game but with a 800 player teammate (instead of the 1400), he will get exactly...
With this system, sadly, playing with lower level players leads you to lower your tg elo very quickly. I have to play like 20 games to go 1800 elo and then I play 2 o 3 games with randoms or lower elo friends and my elo down to 1500 again 11, then I have to play 20 games again to go back to my...
1) I think it is a problem, because it doesn't motivate making teams with lower level players; we have to use smurfs accounts to play with lower level friends. Otherwise, we lose 100 points in three games.
It's true that my elo will be pushed back towards my true strength, but this will take a...
1) For example, I think there could be a limitation on the amount of points awarded per game. I mean: keep this 1v1 system but with a points limitation, so we don't lose 30 points per game when playing with lower-rated teammates.
If I remember correctly, in voobly it was like:
4v4 = 3/4 points...
As we all probably known, since the team games elo system was changed, with the goal that there are no more “farmers”, the score in each game works exactly the same as 1v1: the system compares your individual elo with the team average. For example:
Team 1:
Player A (2000)
Player B (1000)
Team...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.