Fixed that for you.
You don't have a clue. You're posts are continually laughed at no matter where you post them.
You have zero regard for rules and break them constantly.
You're about as trustworthy as a politician.
Bye and welcome to ignore.
No. They don't. Go look at the pick rate of Vietnamese in kotd5. Then look at the pick rate of other a tier civs in kotd5. You are a liar.
Vietnamese 1.82% play rate.
20 civs had a higher play rate.
Why don't we see viper and hera using vietnamese likr an a tier civ?
Why don't we see it used in tournaments like an a tier civ?
Use your brain equalizer
Not to mention, that despite pros being anti vietnamese buffs (at least viper and hera), and both saying it's one of the strongest civs, both of them don't really seem to pick the civ much, and it didn't see much use in kotd5, nor in tournaments in general.
Now I'm generally not one to question...
Only 12 games played. Now go compare that to other a tier civs on hera and vipers list.
Furthermore, again, on the ladder they do not look anything close to a tier
Your right my bad. Still for a civ he calls a tier I didn't see it getting used or performing likr an a tier civ
And yet the playrate says not a tier. The ladder says not a tier and the tournament says not a tier
Vietnamese and hindustanis? Data says yes.
Britons and Byzantines? Let's be honest. The buff to them was incredibly minor, but I'd have no issue with it being reverted.
Those same pros who despite saying vietnamese were a tier rarely used them? Btw viper put viet in c tier.
Those same pros who rate Burgundians as b/c tier and rarely used them but according to you need nerfs?
Those same pros who said hindustanis are b/c tier and rarely used them?
So equalizer...
Don't think anyone disagrees that franks need a nerf for lower levels, but his argument frequently conflicts with reality on a lot of things and he has a habit of using a sledge where a scalpel will do
The best part is that actual data puts the lie to his opinion several times. He states one thing and then ignores when the data doesnt support his own argument.
Lithuanians- sure see lots of use, but the data from tournaments and ladder show that they arent oppressive.
Burgundians - little to...
Equalizer. According to stats and tournaments I'm proposing buffs and nerfs to certain civs.
Also equalizer. Despite the stats and tournaments vietnamese don't need buffs
and even that's debatable, as the op is making changes to civs that are both above (buffs) and below (nerfs) or at this threshold by viper and heras standards.
So winrates would reflect that right? Stats > your opinion every time.
If you really want to nerf stuff on civs because you view rhem as problems, and that civ isn't even overperforming, you're obligated to buff them elsewhere.
Stop being biased. Either solve problems or shut up.
Even the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.