I totally agreed with you. Adding Romans was a very big mistake, it is a civ that doesn't belong to the game at any face.
Until now we still have tons of balance problems with civs were 20 years ago in the game this is regardless the new ones since DE, and now we have the dumb Romans and we...
Arambai still weak not like before even with the last buff, the unit is useless in most cases and too much expensive. Burmese in general still need some changes.
Never said all 20 civs broken, and not all the suggestions are nerfs, those suggestions have buffs, but indeed those civs that I suggest to nerf are not balanced at all, and they have big and major advantages over any civ else and big gap and give unfair match ups. For Hindus yeah they really...
First of all some of these suggestions have buffs to some civs not nerfs. 2nd thing, giving some nerf suggestions for some civs doesn't mean they are totally OP but at the same time they are not balanced either and have many problems to play with/against them and many unfair advantages.
Ghulam and Camels and even CA say hello add to them the broken gunpowder. And why you make imp age comparison when you as Hindus have the advantage start from dark? If you play Hindus you can EZ kill your opponent in castle or even feudal. In imp they even have waaaaaaaay better advantages also...
5% bonuses? You mean Berbers vills speed? Why nkt even 5% more speed is not bad. Berbers actually are ao strong and need maybe at least 2 nerfs. Their eco is great and their tech tree is insane, S tier UU and crazy stable discount impact.
These suggestion won't make the game more generic about...
Hello everyone hope you are well.
I would like to discuss with you this list of balance suggestions which I know that you will not like anyway but still..so they should be added for the fair play and better balance.
Balance suggestions for some civs
**General suggestions changes**
**1-The...
Portuguese are not weak at all. The 20% discount on all gold units alone is ridiculously strong, and their 30% faster techs wad so strong. The civ was never bad at all.
It won't be that much problematic if the game was well balanced, but unfortunately it is not. Giving shared explanations available for all now will make the already broken tgs even more broken. Instead of nerfing the broken and strong civs like Burgundians, Sicilians, Franks, Britons...
This whole patch is weak and the changes won't make that any difference. For the point of this topic, I think in general it is fine but it will also make some civs have way better advantages in early team games thus make the game more imbalanced.
I totally agree that the major problem in the community now is actually the team games queue system.
IMO the best thing is making the team games be able to choose any map they want to queue with and give unlimited bans so you can queue with one map only.
The other big problem in team games is...
It is not. Indians didn't get a redesign more than what should we call it OVERBUFF TO HEAVENS.
They literally got like 6 buffs at once if not even more, and what they lost? Elephant archer? 11. Parthian tactcis? 11. Fishing bonus and most played map Arabia with no fish? 11. This is not a...
Because the redesign will never happen, this is why nerfs or balance suggestions is the only way. For example Sicilians, Cumans and Burgundians have major problem with the design, will the devs delete them? It will never happen. Will the devs delete their original bonuses design and add new...
Don't tell me that you or the guy took it seriously because I am clearly trolling 11.
And in the end we are really not the same, he thinks the game is "perfectly balanced more then ever before" which I heard this sentence more than 100 times from many, and I think the game is far to be balanced...
I already put reasons and explanations in my suggestion why these things need a change and how did they effect on the game. If all you care about is numbers then sorry I can't help you.
And what wants me to do? Say what 99% of the community say that the game is perfectly balanced and all civs have fair matchs between them and all they care about is playing the game with no thinking of bring a fair matchs? No, the game is not balanced at all and more than 15 civs need nerfs and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.