Shared exploration is destroying the classic feel of nations cup? In the last 5 years we more than doubled the amount of civilisations, had tons of game behaviour changes, tons of quality of life improvements, hunderds of balance changes and yet seeing your ally in darkage/feudal + having better...
There have been 3 Rage Forest tournaments with shared exploration so far - with increasing success and there is a good chance that we will have another one - so the claim that every TG tournament was played without shared exploration is wrong.
Allied vision is just an other quality of life...
A very good change, often you cant wait until your market is up to see where exactly that army is going or what and how exactly your ally performs and plays.
I dont see any good argument aggainst allied vision as default in TGs, i mean how can you be in favour for worse communication for everyone?
Every visual mod should always be allowed imo. It's one of the biggest advantages of aoe over other games, that you have insane mod support. Minimap is too small? Np, download a mod and you will get a bigger size. A player colour isnt visible enough, you can just download a mod. Whatever problem...
no that has nothing to do with civ picking. You will play the same 18/19 pop archer strat with whatever civ you have. If you didnt pick a top archer civs, you just extra disadvantage, but the game will stay as snowbally as without. Picking a civ doesn't spawn more trees around your base 11
100% agree with you, 18 pop archer from flank is extremly hard to stop and the low/exposed economy one has makes games very snowbally and easily decided at min 13. That's a problem on any open landmap right now. Instead of advancing through the ages you end up with an eco-age where you play down...
Maurice Weber = journalist from gamestar, who streams from time to time as well, well-experienced in build-up games like Anno or Siedler series, but not so much in aoe. Average viewer count like 1k I think?
Maxim = variety streamer, streams whatever is popular/new. Played aoe a few times, but...
imo the fairest approach in case someone can't come would be to let all players who made it into the qualifying matched/Ro8, but didnt qualify, battle down for the remaining spots.
That would be: Dogao, Ganji, Dark, Kingston, Slam and Sebastian.
I hope that a replacement won't just be done via...
please post this kind of stuff in aoeforums, here:
https://forums.ageofempires.com/c/age-of-empires-ii/aoe2-de-bugs/102
that's where devs will find it the fastest.
have you completly lost your mind or what? HGB and other bullies pointtraded the **** out of the system and now you cry for his 2k lost points? All these pointtraders should have been banned or at very least completly reset.
Disagree, there were some really nice back and forth games in wandering warriors cup, I guess thats also the reason why t90 went for it. Fine decision imo, afterall its still draft and the map will not be played every set.
e) use my brain and report him and then also write to everyone else in the game to report him so he gets high priority to be banned. Dodging won't stop this antisemitism, reporting does.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.