i'm using my self as an example but of course there are many other players probably having the same issue but i just want to give you guys an example : on the right you can see how many points tournament winners get, I played 6 S tier tournaments which gave me 932 elo with top 16/top12...
I agree this system isn't perfect and shouldn't be used in a S tier tournament which gives a spot to redbull and since the platinium league is S tier why don't we use the S tier ranking to determine the players deserving their spot? Would make much more sense imo and looking at the list of...
yes because out of the top 50 players don't have many tournaments played so it's easy for new comers to catch up, while to get into the top 20 it's an other story especially if tournaments entrance is denied because the atp elo is not high enough
well, the results are here, i'm ending up atleast top 16 of every tournament with all the big names so i don't see how being number 34 in atp ranking is fair
I read most of the topic and many things have been said already and I want to give my pov as a player : I have to agree with people saying "smaller tournaments" have too much importance compare to S tier tournaments, I agree I only have 7 tournaments counting for the ATP ranking since I couldnt...
and i don't think we should nerf everything which is strong or the game will become even more casual, we shouldn't get rid of the spectacular aspects in aoe 2
the attack move feature is surely not perfect but I'm more shocked about the stand ground + patrol thing that liereyy does, it even looks like units are sliding when he is doing that
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.