Recent content by Dr___Mundo

Well vinchester who is one of the biggest users of the strategy has still been doing it whenever I've seen him play arena. Seems as legit as it ever was.

Yeah its tragic that new players don't know a game mode. How come they're not proficient at it after 3 games. If you're upset then teach them. I feel your pain, DM tg queue gives actually competitive and enjoyable matches very rarely but banning new players is not even close to a reasonable...

Only bad players on the ladder are the toxic people who rather go complain on reddit and aoezone rather than focus on improving.

It's old patch according to F1res stream.

Nice analogy if we ignore that mongols and franks being nerfed before incas :smile:

Unfair and OP are not the same thing.

Bans are not bad they just nerf the one tricks, which is NOT a bad thing. Tournaments are meant to measure skill NOT amount of games with your 3 favorite civs.

Why is removing strategies that are unfair and unfun to play against so bad thing? Game is supposed to be FUN. So removing things that only make people cry and frustrated are the things that should be removed. Who cares if some civ has 56% winrate, I can live with dying to franks over and over...

They don't need to but is easier than the method you are proposing. 11

Fair enough

Id say easy points. Random people gaining tons of elo abusing burgundians or lithuanians even before the hotfix, but they still can't beat someone better than them.

Well reported forsure ;)

Funny idea but it would cause way too much confusion AND most people wouldnt even recognise half of the names.

Now more serious reply to the topic. Your chess example is completely flawed. AOE2 is RTS and chess is TBS, you cannot seriously compare the 2 games like that, for TBS that kind of micro managing is pointless but for RTS it is universal across most titles. And then your definitions of micro...

Yeah micro sucks! Lets convert aoe2 into turnbased game, easy! Nomore boring micro, only skill!