I would like to hear the community's opinion on this, which elo do you consider to be a high level player.
Ex: 1800 or 2k. only above 2400. etc...
Ex: 1800 or 2k. only above 2400. etc...
world class | High level | good | my skill level | basic knowledge | noobs | |
portion | 0,07% | 0,27% | 1,10% | 4,49% | 18,43% | 75,56% |
total number | 30 | 123 | 504 | 2068 | 8477 | 34757 |
lowest rank | 30 | 153 | 657 | 2725 | 11202 | 45959 |
elo cutoff | 2488 | 2168 | 1859 | 1551 | 1199 | 0 |
elo cutoff ≈ | 2400 | 2100 | 1800 | 1500 | 1200 | 0 |
How did you get this information?This is my take. How would you call my skill level?
world class High level good my skill level basic knowledge noobs portion 0,07% 0,27% 1,10% 4,49% 18,43% 75,56%total number 30 123 504 2068 8477 34757lowest rank 30 153 657 2725 11202 45959elo cutoff 2488 2168 1859 1551 1199 0elo cutoff ≈ 2400 2100 1800 1500 1200 0
Very good, likeEu brinquei no excel 11
Os fatos são:
-elo cortes nessa classificação exata de aoe2.net
-número total de jogadores 46000
Minhas decisões foram:
-classe mundial é de 30 jogadores
-6 níveis de habilidade
-número de jogadores aumenta exponencialmente quanto mais baixo você for. (base 4,1 então soma 100%)
great comment, very detailed and I really liked your opinion.My highest peak was 1800 when I was really grinding hard. And I couldn't even touch a 1900 if they played the ladder game as seriously. Of course, elo is just a number, but being called high level is definitely atleast 2k+ back in the old days. And currently, I would say even above 2200.
2700+ Super Pros, who only drop games vs pros occasionally (maybe 1/4 games vs pros)
2500+ Pro, usually will always win a player below 2300 9/10 times
2300+ Expert (or whatever label you want to call it) : Can compete vs anyone, might have 50/50 winrate in their own range, 80/20 vs above 2100s.
2200 : Fair middle ground to consider high level
2100 : really trying hard to get to that high level status
2000 : the benchmark to even consider oneself as a high level player 11
1900 : Beats every 1700 and below like a chump, drops games vs 1800s+, can compete vs 2000
1800 : Considers themselves a good player and is actually a fairly decent player, can hold their own in a RF lobby
1700 : Try hard 1600 who lames every game
1600 : Considers themselves a good player but only beats a 1500 due to having played 500+ more games, more experience (older players, I come across so many known names at this elo and all are like me thinking we are good players 11).
1500 : New DE wannabes reaching this feat after learning kts or xbows due to franks or britons and adapting to other civs and transitions thereby winning 1400s. Has prior RTS experience or has good macro micro cycles
1400 : Beats 1300 and below with the same franks britons picking but being better
1300 and below : All noobs
I am gonna try to make a bottom-up elo list as well and try to make it as descriptive as possible