Considering how much trouble they gave the Spanish with periodic rebellions for generations after their conquest, the Incas can probably make a better claim to being warriors than the Aztecs ever could.
If you don't know what are you talking about you shouldn't, the spanish didn't beat the aztecs, their illness did and the betrayal of the surrounding people.Considering how much trouble they gave the Spanish with periodic rebellions for generations after their conquest, the Incas can probably make a better claim to being warriors than the Aztecs ever could.
If you don't know what are you talking about you shouldn't, the spanish didn't beat the aztecs, their illness did and the betrayal of the surrounding people.
The spanish always enjoy taking the credit of the smallpox and measles 1111
Five whole characters you didn't need to type.No moreEurocivs please.
I have a picture in my head - so great - listen - this civ is so nice - you will love it.
A civ that makes AoE run smooth with AMD GPUs with green-eco efficiency mode. So an user like me that is waiting decades for fix can actually play and enjoy the game again.
Sounds great, right?
The Crusader states are covered by Western European civs currently in the game.I'd rather want more balance and gameplay fix.
Also, Bloodlines or 2 pierce armour for cataphract please! xD
Anyway, on topic.
I think "Indian" civ should be broken up.
Rename current Indian as Rajasthan or something. And add another civ which represents the South, like maybe the Cholas, they should get battle elephants.
"Slav" should be renamed to Russians or something.
How about adding a crusader state as a civ?
He only said Africa + India + China and not the entirety of Asia. For India + China + Africa we only have Indians, Chinese, Malians and Ehtiopians.He is sarcastic.
and you missed Huns, mongols, Ethiopians, Japanese, korea,malay, Khmer, Vietnamese
they are also aisa/African.
also when I last checked, Turks, Persians are also on Asian continent.
For north Africa we also have Berbers and Saracens but I agree that these regions could use some more civs.He only said Africa + India + China and not the entirety of Asia. For India + China + Africa we only have Indians, Chinese, Malians and Ehtiopians.
what about slovaks, bazmeg?! :DKingdom of Hungary still doesn't have every ethnic group represented, so I would say the two new civs should be Croatians and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jasz_people
They start out as Bohemians or Slavs and towards imperial age most units turn into Magyarswhat about slovaks, bazmeg?! :D
They start out as Bohemians or Slavs and towards imperial age most units turn into Magyars
That's the DLC after this one, with Slovaks and Slovenians, we must do everything to get people confuse them!what about slovaks, bazmeg?! :D
Thats how the Hungarian kingdom worked in its later stages according to my Slovak friend
Song / Yuan / Ming Dynasty would be super tricky.Is it time yet for a Chinese campaign or asking for too much?
No need to change anything about the current civ at all, except name.I like the idea of breaking up or renaming overly inclusive civs like Italians or Indians but people that love playing those civs would probably hate it.
Yeah, but it'll be great to have at least one of them represented as it's own civ.The Crusader states are covered by Western European civs currently in the game.
AoE2 is not about representing every minor political entity that existed during the Middle Ages.Yeah, but it'll be great to have at least one of them represented as it's own civ.
They were quite a prominent thing during the crusades.AoE2 is not about representing every minor political entity that existed during the Middle Ages.
They are already represented as a civ by Franks. Civs are meant to be groups of people, not political entities. Yes the recent shovelware expansions upended this but that does not mean we should continue down the path.They were quite a prominent thing during the crusades.
Considering crusades/jihad has some focus in AOE2 campaigns. it would be fitting to have one of them represented as a civ.
By your argument, might as well put Bohemians under Teutons/Germans, yet here we are.