A discussion around upsets being a good thing is a bit weird when it comes to seeding. Because seeding by design has the aim to make upsets as unlikely as possible.
aoe1 people actually have the most reason to complain imho. The ladder system for aoe2 is questionable, the choices for aoe4 are probably worse, judging by the aoe4 feedback I read. But aoe1 gets a country locked event (again) with people saying that the qualification spots for that event might...
I did not mean to be condescending and I will admit that the wording was not optimal. Breakthrough is certainly not the right word considering your accomplishments; sorry for the poor representation of that.
I dont think this changes too much towards the point made, however. And I dont think it...
While mistakes can always happen - and the wrong order is kind of a classic one often done by players when posting recs in less high tier tournaments - and the overall admin work was fantastic (thanks a lot!) I do have to agree with the doubts on the lack of transparency concerning #3.
The...
Oh wow. Mistakes can happen, but I think that really should have been made public during the tournament. We read a 4-1 score over all the week on the brackets when it was actually a 4-2 set. Big kudos to Barles.
For me, the farm theories also helped a lot on ruling people out (alternatives to Barles) and confirming thoughts I had anyways (Ganji being Robert - or rather Ganji not being anyone else). So i do attribute my 16/16 to farm theory in not as small parts. Thanks to all the farm analysands.
Thats all very reasonable. My remaining doubts are the Ethiopian picks for Vasco (isnt that Liereyy) and the Islands pick for Alexios (more Hera than Liereyy). Also the Mongols 1st pick feels like Hera.
Edit: Mongol Arb, well 11
Edit2: Arb actually would make sense given the matchup and what...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.